rodneylives

joined 2 years ago
[–] rodneylives@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

As someone who doesn't generally play with children's toys, i still say the answer is never.

As Randall Munroe said way back in XKCD #150, we're the grownups now, and we get to decide what that means. Life is too short not to spend as much of it as you can doing what you want. So long as it doesn't interfere with others, go wild.

[–] rodneylives@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

I don't have unpopular UI opinions, but I do have opinions that I don't see people echo much, yet.

One of the worst things about UI in 2025 is that almost everything most people use on a computer relies on it, more than ever, and yet it's also at its worst point since the days before mouse driven interfaces. Companies used to be much stricter about their interfaces, how they worked and looked. Now there are tons of bespoke interfaces where everyone decides for themselves how they work, and assumptions made by one program work the opposite way in a different one.

Switches have become way to obvious to what "on" and "off" is. Even when they state something like an option is enabled or not in text, it often isn't clear whether it's saying this is what the state is now, or this is what it will be when clicked.

Icons have become way too vague and arbitrary as to what they mean. The Hamburger menu was bad enough, but some of the icons have gotten way too abstract. At least the floppy disk for saving was a convention.

Web pages likewise could use a lot more consistency and visibility. The new Digg, for instance, hides its user block function behind a light-gray three-dots button on a white background. The only options on that menu are to Report or Block that user! Why is it three dots, and why is it so hard to see?

Microsoft's "Ribbon" interface remains a terrible idea. At least with menu bars you know all the functions are there, somewhere, all represented by text. With the Ribbon, everything's a toolbar button, and with many of them being different sizes it's harder to scan through them to find the option you're looking for.

[–] rodneylives@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Thank you for your service!

[–] rodneylives@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

There is absolutely no excuse. It's not like he was an unknown quantity. No amount of disdain is too great for these people.

[–] rodneylives@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

If only she had come to this realization NINE YEARS AGO

[–] rodneylives@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Fox Mulder has his own candy.

[–] rodneylives@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Demand? What?

You can just have a site that says things. You might just get a trickle of readers, and that's okay. Not everything has to try to rule the world. You can contribute this little part of it, that might amuse or inform some people, and not pile up yet more value to a terrible corporation like Wordpress, Facebook, Twitter, Reddit or (while I'm ranting) Fandom.

Plain HTML doesn't break. You don't need to update frameworks. It won't make the user's browser consume a ton of their RAM. Even if your image hosting goes down, the text will still be there. The biggest problems with HTML are external. Google giving attention to Reddit over your site, or de-prioritizing it if it's not "responsive to mobile," and web browsers choosing not to reveal by default what terrible resource hogs big sites can be. Check about:processes (on Firefox at least) some time, I've seen Youtube, Facebook and Twitter consume over a gigabyte of memory by themselves, apiece. (Nota bene, Mastodon consumes a lot too.)

It's okay to be small. That was what the World Wide Web was envisioned as, its motto: Let's Share What We Know.

[–] rodneylives@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm an old E2 member!

[–] rodneylives@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Anyone remember Happy Puppy?

There used to be rotten.com, which posted extremely disturbing pictures and I don't miss that part of it. But I do miss the Rotten Library, which used to be a bastion of suppressed literature.

My old stomping grounds, the indie gaming blog GameSetWatch.

[–] rodneylives@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Not consuming more than 10MB of RAM

[–] rodneylives@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Same here. Nothing could convince me to go back to Reddit or Twitter at this point.

[–] rodneylives@lemmy.world 45 points 8 months ago

It is a mistake to lead off with "here's the thing about Elon Musk," because there's LOADS of things with Musk, but in particular. Let's set aside how ludicrous it is to claim that the protesters are being funded by some outside source, because sure that's worked in the past, and of course it's the Democrats, those notably cash-positive people, who are doing it.

Elon Musk is THE RICHEST MAN IN THE WORLD. If anyone could beat a theoretical money-backed protest against him, it would be him. Just offer to beat the offer of anyone funding the protesters. That's it! If they're only in it for the money then the protest would fold immediately.

More than that, Musk has literally paid people to vote in his favor in the Wisconsin Supreme Court race! The levels of hypocrisy are so staggeringly great that it risks materializing actual hippopotamuses on his properties.

view more: next ›