reddig33

Why would she ask that? She works for Bari Weiss and David Ellison. 60 minutes actually cut Trump having tantrum from the interview.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/maryroeloffs/2025/11/03/heres-what-cbs-cut-out-of-its-60-minutes-interview-with-trump/

To make more electricity, they should try using some of the hot air that constantly comes out of Nadella’s mouth.

Studios shouldn’t be allowed to own tv channels. (Or cable/internet providers).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Paramount_Pictures%2C_Inc.

Do elder statesmen like Obama bother mentoring or training their “replacements”? Seems like we would have more Obama’s in the pipeline if that was the case.

Slammed!

I doubt it really has much to do with AI. The economy is in the toilet right now due to tariffs and severe mismanagement. AI is being used as a scapegoat for layoffs and unemployment.

Gotta have a government-recognized binding contract so your spouse can make legal decisions for you. Call it whatever you want (marriage cert, domestic partner) but it has to be the same for all people under the law.

This is part of what the fight for marriage equality was all about. Spouses were unable to see their partners in the hospital, or get custody of children, or inherit, etc. etc. Some people tried to draw up legal agreements, but they ran into obstacles with other family members taking them to court. Remember, “Separate, but equal is inherently unequal.”

Up next:

• Judges no longer required to marry interracial couples.
• Judges no longer required to marry women pregnant out of wedlock.
• Judges no longer required to marry Muslims, Jews, or athiests.
• Judges no longer required to marry divorced persons.

Take your pick. This is what happens when government steps outside of contract law, and into endorsement of religious beliefs.

The website you linked to says that it’s not a class action suit, but a “mass arbitration” which I’ve never heard of. It also claims that Google has a “no class action” clause in its warranty/user agreement. I don’t see how that’s legal, but whatever. I also wonder if that clause was there at the time of purchase for gen 1 and gen 2 thermostats.

While an interesting idea, that project wants what amounts to the cost of a new thermostat in exchange for a kickstarter project. Might as well just buy a new thermostat.

Please find another news source besides CBS News.

Surprisingly, these still work as dumb thermostats after the cutoff date.