phanto

joined 2 years ago
[–] phanto@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Huh. Today I learned. I avoided snaps because Firefox snap took so dang long to load, and Firefox flatpak just launched...

[–] phanto@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Flatpaks: NOT Ubuntu's containerized deliverable. They use snaps. Flatpaks are more Fedora's thing. I know Mint uses flatpaks, and Silver blue relies heavily on them. Snaps v Flatpaks are like Coke v Pepsi. It's all just sugar water, but people care, for reasons.

[–] phanto@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

Tailscale: a VPN -esque service that lets you connect networks together in fun and interesting ways. For instance: I can use tailscale to access my home network from my phone!

[–] phanto@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

Thank you, that was very nice! But I do love my car, too.

[–] phanto@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Prisencolinensinainciusol! That song rocks.

[–] phanto@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

VROOOoooOOOMMM! Hee hee! I got a hybrid standard, and I will drive it until it literally falls apart (or I do.)

[–] phanto@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 weeks ago

I tried Bazzite on an old mid-tier gaming laptop, was Mondo impressed. I basically agree with all the things you said. Amusingly, I find that just general purpose computing is snappier and smoother too, so I wound up using it mostly as my surfing/Plex/shopping machine more than anything else.

[–] phanto@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Feel free to ask questions if you have them. I am no expert, but I am willing to try to help if you get stuck.

[–] phanto@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  1. You are going to find people who have done both. A lot of NAS devices run kind of low powered CPUs so separating it out into two devices can get you more compute power than a single device. For example, an old as the hills file bay may cost next to nothing, and then using your "last" desktop will get you a lot more storage and compute than a 1500$ modern NAS, but it'll take up more space, cost more in electricity to run, and make more fan noise. This is the route I went. A modern NAS should be able to run what you listed though.
  2. TrueNAS scale is all about storage, but it lets you also run containers. Proxmox is all about virtualization, but you can then run a storage solution inside a VM or container. It's not the kind of thing you're going to get a right answer for because either way can work. Both are well-documented, capable solutions. I have tried both at times, but I had a lot more experience with Proxmox by the time I deployed TrueNAS, so I stuck with Proxmox and use a TrueNAS box (bare metal) for backups. It really is a matter of preference.
  3. If you have a MiniPC and NAS as separate devices, you will want to set up a network share, so you can seed on the MiniPC the copy that's on the NAS. My seeding, Jellyfin, Plex, etc, all happen in a virtual hard drive mounted in a separate container from the services. Each of the services "see that drive as a network share despite being hosted on the same physical hardware.
[–] phanto@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Guys... "sudo." Four characters.

[–] phanto@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I have a Tiny connected to a startech dual USB drive dock. The drives get warm, but not deadly hot. Moving big files is a bit slow, but for streaming on Plex and Jellyfin it works fine.

[–] phanto@lemmy.ca 37 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I have a house in Alberta. I wonder if there's a way to cede my property back to the Treaty nations when I die... They deserve it more than my relatives do.

view more: next ›