It's also not true in a relevant way. In the abstract, on its own, sure. If a presidential candidate argued for less military spending during an election campaign they would be painted as weak , and trying to weaken American increasingly dangerous world. Probably conspiracy theories about them being a foreign agent. And they would either lose outright or at least pay a significant political price.
nova_ad_vitum
The one thing they could have made Shepard read that would make him invite the reapers invasion.
Related question: where can I voluntarily get a lobotomy?
You know there's a Canadian sports exec named Dick Pound?
Mr and Mrs Pound had a baby, looked at it, and said "were going to name him Richard, and he will be known as Dick. With a hard D".
Really makes you wonder.
Those shares are also generally for sale for a high enough price. Given the immense current value of the brand, when Gabe dies vultures of every variety will start circling. If they offer employees 2x their share price to sell, enough of them will do it to lose control to investors that just want to enshittify everything and milk it's brand for every last penny as they drive it into the ground.
He's acting exactly like a current established Democrat leader. He is proudly saying he doesn't take money from PACs, except AIPAC is the exception and if you ask why you're antisemitic. He cares about keeping the democratic unconditionally and uncritically 100 perfect behind Israel as his main policy goal, far more than any domestic concern. In that he has tons of company and is doing his job just fine.
The short version is that they identified with Trump's misogyny to such a great extent that they were able to overlook his racism.
The best Americans can do is an organized protest on a weekend that doesn't affect the economy, ensuring that it can be safely ignored.
Half these posts are just AI bots shouting nonsense at each other.
Even given their horeshit premises that page is comically badly written. I don't even think they used AI, because AI could have done it better.
So what? What is he afraid of? Just say it's AI. Whatever Putin's leverage was it evaporated the moment Trump won his second term. Trump just doesn't want to tank the week of chaos and embarrassment that it would cause because he's incredibly weak.
It's generally useful to think of these things in more nuanced terms than right or wrong. If/when they are unified, it will be a refinement.
https://hermiene.net/essays-trans/relativity_of_wrong.html