mapto

The beauty of pluralism is that it allows for different means (and metrics) of achieving a goal.

And I'm saying this as someone coming from a post-communist country where totalitarianism is the powerful position.

I'd claim that it should not be about "anyone". It should be targeted. If you are to "disturb" someone, better do this intentionally and with the clear idea what such disturbance is meant to achieve.

I'm not saying you should stand still. I'm saying that you should think before (and after) you act. Wouldn't hurt too much, would it?

But should it be extreme? I reckon it should be effective instead. Whether effective means awareness, resignations or something else is a conversation that varies a lot from context to context.