grumt

joined 1 week ago
[–] grumt@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

That's fair hahaha

[–] grumt@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Well, 4get use a scraper, so I can use searxng, startpage or any other indexer with it (including DuckDuckGo, google, yandex etc). And another thing is the fact that almost every instance has support for Tor hidden services (which I use). But in the the end is more of matter of preference, I'm more of a fan of the less modern frontend

[–] grumt@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

yeah, the dev seems kinda like a shitposter ngl (although there are some funny pictures in the front page)

collapsed inline media

However, I configured it as my default search engine, so I never go to the front page. Also, at least is free and open source (AGPL)

[–] grumt@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 days ago (11 children)

Been using 4get for some time now, I don't think a search engine can get better than this

1
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by grumt@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
 

So, I've been using keepassxc for some time now, but I wanted a viable alternative for command line usage (there is keepassxc-cli, that I use, but it is really a pain in the ass). So, I searched and found pass and gopass.

However, I've seen that they store each entry in a gpg encrypted file, inside a plain directory hierarchy. And, don't get me wrong, I believe that there are use cases for this, but if someone got their hands in your password_store, they would know every single login that you have (the only information that is protected is the password, or whatever is in the gpg file).

So, my question is, there is a password manager, cli based, that encrypts the whole database, and not the single entries?

Update: there is a pass extension made specifically to address this issue