I mean after that, once the server is shut down and hosting bills are paid.
What will happen to the remaining donated funds once everything has been settled (assuming there's funds left over)?
Sounds like it's not the technical side that's too difficult, but managing the users.
I'm pretty sure the EU mandated this feature.
Hopefully this has severely compromised the structural integrity of the bridge.
I'd kind of think it would be in their interest to, not because they give a shit about what their end users think, but what their customers (advertisers) think. I'd imagine that advertisers are paying x amount to reach real humans that can spend money, so if it turns out that businesses are paying to advertise to bots then I can't see them being too happy about that. Not unless they're upfront with businesses and they tell them that x% of their user base is bots and they'll only charge them to advertise to real people.
I get it. They want to combat bots and potentially even detect if a person is old enough to use the platform. However Facebook has eroded absolutely any trust that there's no way I'd give them this. Not that I use Facebook anyway.
It's a nice bike! What sort of range does it get?
Are your tyres big enough?
Do you mean sold?
It's kinda funny that they're "legitimate interest", as that infers that the other ones aren't legitmate.
It's not like internal build servers are 100% reliable, scaleable and cheap though. Personally I've found cloud based build tools to be just a better experience as a dev.