I have no idea what this means. Like I understand the individual words but when you put them together it's just noise.
balance8873
joined 3 weeks ago
Depends on how much you care about security. Some distros are still very focused on "I operate my desktop in my locked house and don't expect police to knock" use cases. If you're chill with typing in a disk encryption password on boot you can turn that on, but getting a seamless secure boot+tpm decrypt is pretty challenging.
And then if that is what you want, people will of course happily tell you what a stupid insecure idea that is because Intel or Microsoft or something.
To answer your question broadly: I found arch/endeavor to be easier to secure and have a single set of solid instructions. OpenSuse and fedora both had multiple mediocre and deeply iffy sets of instructions, but for basic setup and use they are easier to use. OpenSuse bricked several times, fedora was far far far more stable for me but you'll hear countless people with the opposite story. I don't care for Ubuntu.
The bigger impact past setup is the desktop environment. You pick gnome (Ubuntu, fedora, endeavor) if you hate yourself and think some random dev 5000 miles away can make decisions for you better than you can. You pick KDE (fedora, suse, endeavor) if you want a nice windowsesque experience. You pick cosmic (popos, derived from Ubuntu) if you want to try something new that might suck. There are others but they are mostly if you want a super cut down experience.
People have recommended mint for new users for at least a decade or so. Please just don't. It's super out of date.
You don't know their life. Some people can't help but smell what the rock is cooking.
WWE changed its name due to the WWF suing the WWF. Its not even my joke, it's just our legal system being a joke.
Because people keep giving them money
They haven't actually got a full monopoly. You can give axs money. You can in some cases go to the box office ahead of time like it's 1980.
If you want to see taytay, you are indeed going to pay ticketmaster, but the only way to defeat them is by not giving them money.
Awww, we found a child who has never seen the xkcd
It took me 5 or so clicks to get to a faq on their website which vaguely talks about it: this is about games that rely on servers which get shut down.
They renamed themselves to WWE in the 2000s :(
Street party at least
Everyone thinks grandpa should die but nobody wants to kill their grandpa
‘There isn’t really another choice:’ Signal chief explains why the encrypted messenger relies on AWS
Lol imagine still being stuck on blockchain in 2025
I still don't get what you're actually proposing, though. Companies run on money. If enough people are willing to say "no, I don't want to see that show enough" then there is the possibility of change.
If you're saying in an ideal world the government would do some antitrust...sure, as you said I'll check back in in a decade and see how that's going. For now I just don't give them my money.