aberrate_junior_beatnik

Tell me you know nothing about the kennedys without saying you know nothing about the kennedys

• https://www.theverge.com/politics/777313/charlie-kirks-alleged-killer-scratched-bullets-with-a-helldivers-combo-and-a-furry-sex-meme
• https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/09/12/charlie-kirk-shooter-tyler-robinson-gun-casings-inscriptions/86111606007/
• https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/12/suspect-charlie-kirk-shooting

None of this is retracted, and these aren't the manufacturer's markings. I'll go ahead and be dumb enough to believe the reporting from all these '"news" orgs'. I am now propagandized into believing that a clearly unwell person made a potentially unusual decision.

AFAIK, the casings messages are real, just different than originally reported. And while it's true major news orgs have an anti left bias, it doesn't manifest in this specific way. They tend to accurately report these kinds of facts in a timely manner.

Then again, the WSJ did break with this behavior, so maybe things are changing and I need to recalibrate.

https://xcancel.com/DavidShuster/status/1966576856515203480

I still think it's too early to call this, I'm not seeing reporting by major orgs on it. It does seem plausible based on the messages on the casings, but I also thought it plausible he was a leftist

7 of the 10 largest pharma companies spent more on marketing than r&d during the height of the covid 19 pandemic. In aggregate, the 10 companies spent 37% more on marketing than r&d.

Source

Isn't the production of medicine a miniscule part of its cost? My understanding is that ads and profit are the two biggest costs

This is the one post I've seen here that actually tackles the main problems. Climate change can't be stopped without degrowth, which means putting a stop to capitalism.

I'd like to add: while there would be a lot we'd have to give up, life under a degrowth economy would be good. Way better than what we have now. We'd all have more leisure time to focus on stuff that matters. Sure, we'd have fewer gadgets and toys, but we'd be able to spend more time with loved ones and engaging in creative and fulfilling hobbies.

This is extremely important: we are not at the point of no return.

Climate change can be stopped, even now. It will take lots of work, but it's possible.

ClimateAdam, who has a PhD in climate science from Oxford, made a video about this. It's 5 years old, but he's still making videos with similar points today. It's my understanding this is still the predominant view amongst climate scientists. The main reason I think this is that there aren't many calling for geoengineering, which if we were at the point of no return would be something we'd have to explore.

The reason this is so important is because as climate change denial becomes more and more infeasible, it will get replaced primarily with climate change defeatism. The sooner we start pushing back on this, the better.

Cut them some slack, they’re engineers... And beyond that, they are engineers

Excellent point

What do they know about women?

collapsed inline media

The reference, for those who don't get it

Because it's the wrong size