Human communication 101: sometimes humans ask a question without expecting an answer, it's called a rhetorical question
Shareni
joined 2 years ago
I thought emacs was all about ctrl + ?.
It is, but you have gui features
I use Emacs and neovim. Each is better in different scenarios.
Vim and emacs usually run in the terminal and require keyboard commands to complete actions.
It is most certainly not usual to run Emacs in the terminal.
although of course it's possible to use keyboard commands.
And you can use Emacs with a mouse.
I mean, it's an IBM ThinkPad, it is slow. Linux just makes it usable.
You should have been added after like a century of constantly invading countries, funding extremists, setting up "revolutions" promoting their puppets, causing genocide, and doing war crimes nobody can persecute you for. Who needs zionisists when the entire country is a temple to unrestricted capitalism run by oligarchs.
Riiiight buddy, it has absolutely nothing to do with you being shown how limited your knowledge is about the philosophies of science and mind.
Was the fox and the grapes your favourite fable growing up?
And as we can map consciousness happening in the body down to individual neurons firing, where would a non-corporeal consciousness interact with a body?
Did I mention dualism or substance monism? Materialism doesn't necessarily include physicalism.
You calling these reliably reproducible facts unscientific belies a fundamental misunderstanding of science.
Read up on why physicalism is not verifiable. Your imagination saying consciousness ends with death is equally verifiable as my imagination saying you're taken away by the flying spaghetti monster.
Though naturalism might not be the only way to investigate the universe, we have yet to encounter any reliable other paradigms.
Ever heard of ontological pluralism? Naturalism is not physicalism...
Read a bit about falsifiability and philosophy of science. Physicalism is a metaphysical theory, and not falsifiable.
I feel different today as my sensory as well as sensory processing organs have developed.
There are a lot more changes influencing your perception of reality than just sensory development.
Being dead, just as before being born, I possess no such organs and expect not to "feel".
That's dependent on your consciousness being limited to your physical body. Who's to say that your consciousness wasn't limited so a pantheistic deity could interact with itself. Both theories are equally unscientific as you can't disprove what happens before or after life
The same reason why you feel different today than when you were just born? You don't even need dualism to have a basis for life after death.
Meanwhile Plato: good times create weak men who think they know everything, can do everything, who change their purpose on a daily basis, and who are easily tricked by sophists into accepting tyranny
Looks at the westerners
http://xahlee.info/kbd/how_to_press_control_key.html