SaltSong

joined 6 months ago
[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 1 points 4 months ago

I've explained it to you twice. I'm going to use small words, this time.

"States rights," is the right of the state government to pass it's own laws.

The right to fight a law in the courts belongs to individual persons, not the state government. If the state government disliked a law, they would not go through the courts, they would just change the law.

"States rights" are for the state government, not the people of the state. Nothing the state government does to the people of that state can go against the rights of the state government, because the people do not have states rights, because they are not states.

Just so we are clear, you are not a state, are you? If you happen to be New Jersey, for example, I could understand your confusion.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 2 points 4 months ago

Huh. TIL. I had always thought that I could get in the deep shit for that.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

if i can be shown to have done so, I will. So far all I see is you misusing the phrase "states rights."

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website -1 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I think it's already illegal to take minors across state lines without parental consent.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website -1 points 4 months ago

Ah, right. I must have been blinded by how stupid it is to put "can't challenge this in court" into a law.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If you need hard workers, I am not your man.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Was there ever any doubt?

I myself like to argue things just to argue them. It's a good way to find out if I'm right, or to learn thing I didn't know, and correct my misunderstandings.

But I know that's not everyone's idea of a good time.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 25 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I’m not a huge fan of intrinsically connecting medication for sexual function with medication for gender-affirming care.

If that were the case, then bottom-surgery wouldn't be gender affirming care either.

Or maybe I'm just misunderstanding the entire concept. To date, I've never seen a single concrete statement on the topic that doesn't upset someone (discounting bloody right-wingers for whom the entire concept is upsetting, bless their hearts) because it somehow invalidates someone else.

However, we seem to be in agreement that these people are raging assholes, and that's the important takeaway.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I do my best every two years or so. It's like trying to put out the sun with a mouthful of water in this state.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 140 points 4 months ago (22 children)

I'm an elder millennial. I feel like my life has spent more time on hold than otherwise. Economic crisis, plague, not-really-a-war-but-war, more economic crisis, watered down dictator. . .

Can I just die already?

view more: ‹ prev next ›