SaltSong

joined 6 months ago
[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 11 points 3 months ago

I'm gonna be extra nasty to him.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 4 points 3 months ago

Interesting. Good to know.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 2 points 3 months ago

Ah, interesting. Good to know.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Interesting.

Not the answer I'm looking for, but still interesting. Thanks for the information!

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 9 points 3 months ago (12 children)

So, a moment of curiosity.

If my theoretical pistol did get pulled into am MRI machine, stuck against it by the magnet, and I, for the purpose of scientific inquiry, pulled the trigger, should I expect the bullet to fire more or less as normal, to fire, but the bullet be pulled back to the machine, or for the bullet to not move, or not move more than an inch or so from the barrel?

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 0 points 3 months ago

Ah, I see. You are thinking about the properly structured flowchart, not the humorously true one.

Yea, fair enough.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 4 points 3 months ago

chasing the dragon

Huh. I guess it might be.

Far from my first game, but my first perfect game. Yea, I guess that does track.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 11 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Not a sequel. Just because it's not Portal 1. The fact that it's second is not the problem. The problem is that the first one was flawless.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 52 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Portal 1 was flawless. Portal 2 had a crucial flaw.

Specifically, it was not Portal 1. Everything else was perfect.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I don't see that as a problem. I can easily get caught in that loop.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 0 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Other than that, it seems fairly accurate.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 1 points 3 months ago

I don't believe so.

I could be wrong.

view more: ‹ prev next ›