this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

15170 readers
114 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Lose interest doesn't seem to have enough connecting arrows

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Other than that, it seems fairly accurate.

[–] xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

there are several problems with this flow chart… question life choices, sulk… i’m wondering if this was ai generated

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't see that as a problem. I can easily get caught in that loop.

[–] xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

it bothers me because of my computer science background… flow charts should be pretty much executable, to me… other people can do whatever they want, i suppose.
but, you could have all of the loops with proper arrows and some decisions in there…

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 0 points 2 weeks ago

Ah, I see. You are thinking about the properly structured flowchart, not the humorously true one.

Yea, fair enough.

[–] Datorie@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Where’s the inevitable desk reject after months of work?

[–] mvirts@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Bruh you still gotta publish that unsupported hypothesis

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Nah, academics love their publication biases.

Wait, I mean journal publishers. Publishers love their publication biases.

[–] match@pawb.social 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Is there a particular journal for this

[–] mvirts@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Hmmmmm if we can sell it to AI companies....

[–] K4mpfie@feddit.org 0 points 2 weeks ago

Idk seems like the whole "write the damn paper and rework it until you're good" part is missing (It's just yet another loop of tantrum and sulk)