They would need more evidence. He can claim the autobiography is a work of fiction designed to sell copies, and that the rape never actually happened.
Without corroborating evidence, the state can't meet its burden of proof.
Rivalarrival
joined 2 years ago
Interesting. A first-person shooter is the view from the perspective of the shooter. A third person shooter is the view from a neutral party - a camera watching the action.
A second-person shooter would be from the viewpoint of those being shot by the protagonist.
A telepathic assassin. You read the mind(s) of your target(s), and somehow use their eyes to kill them.
Corn cares not ~~from~~ whence the shit posts
FTFY. "Whence" means "from what origin".
I would say this is not universal. For some, the written word is the native "tongue", conveying the actual, intended meaning. The written word allows the speaker the opportunity to evaluate and revise their language to match their intent, and the listener the opportunity to re-evaluate previously transmitted thoughts.
The oral variant is dependent on the real-time aptitude of the speaker to articulate their thoughts and message, and for the listener to extract that meaning from the same. For those of us handicapped in these traits, the spoken word is the poor facsimile for actual (written) communication.
I think "whence" is a near-perfect example. "Whence" means "from what origin".
The word is used nearly exclusively in the phrase "from whence it came", or "from (from what origin) it came"
once
Uh huh.
What he wants is the focus on "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" as used in the 14th amendment. He isn't after birthright citizenship. He wants formal recognition that certain people are not owed constitutional protections.
Immediately, he wants "immigrants" to be in the same category as "enemy combatants", whose rights and privileges are defined by international treaty, rather than recognized by the constitution.
This particular manner of death is one in a trillion. The odds that these three were going to die in a car together was quite a bit closer to parity.
I would call that "fraud". In declaring themselves "gynecologists", they are effectively advertising that they are qualified and willing to perform routine gynecological procedures. Their refusal to do so constitutes a fraud on patients seeking such services.
"Neonatology", "Histology", "Reproductive physiology" and "Reproductive biology" are comparable specialty fields wherein the practitioner would not be expected to perform elective abortions.
Additionally, if they would prefer to call themselves "general practitioners", I would be far more lenient in allowing them to define their own scope of practice.
~~Fair~~ Ok
FTFY.
I’m a gynecologist. My religion says I can’t do an abortion.
I would say that if "you" won't perform an abortion, "you" are not actually a gynecologist. Go study and practice urology, or proctology, or gastroenterology, or oncology, or neurology, or cardiology, or dermatology, or any other field where "you" will not be called upon to perform a simple, routine procedure.
The requirement is "proof of financial responsibility" not "insurance" specifically. Every state allows you to establish a surety bond rather than insurance. If you've got $30k-$50k lying around doing nothing, you can let the state hold on to. So long as you don't get sued for damages related to your driving, you get it back when you stop driving.