I believe you would be correct if the roles were reversed. For our sake we should be thankful they are not.
I don't want to be overly optimistic, but if we can find a way to heal our country and make a positive change in our politics, I'm all for it.
The difference here is that the Liberals are not the Democrats. They will stand up and push back. If Poilievre makes it about needless opposition, they will just work with the other parties and keep going. They don't need him.
But yes, I can appreciate what you say. It seems clear that the Republicans and those like them have only ever paid lip service to good faith and respectful dialogue, and they've never done anything but take advantage of anyone who offers them goodwill. I can see this starting in western Canada, and I do believe Poilievre is cut from the same cloth. But I think Carney has a strategic advantage here and it doesn't disadvantage him to at least try to create a better environment. Hard liners won't change, but Canada seems to have softer support in the centre and they generally prefer civil politics.
If the Liberals take electoral reform it will be yet another massive Conservative fumble.
It would be by far the funniest funniest thing.
Yeah that's fair. He's not above politicking, in fact I'm sure his decisions weigh many factors, politics being one of them.
On the topic, I hope that the left doesn't build a personality cult around him. He's not particularly charismatic, he's just a technocrat with skills that can help us. Let the man do his job without deifying him. We don't need more populism right now, we need experts... and we sure don't need celebrity politicians.
I'm not religious, but I feel like this is somehow extra super duper disrespectful. Religious folk are not known for their tolerance of false or satirical iconography.
But I guess he's insulting Catholics so it's probably totally cool with his evangelical base. Oh who am I kidding, he could make AI scat porn with their Lord and Saviour and they'd find a passage in the Bible that supports it.
I'd flatten my nuts with a mallet before I go on truth social, but if you google it you can find other sources talking about it. Such as New York Post, who I assume is proud of his announcement: https://nypost.com/2025/05/02/us-news/trump-declares-may-8-victory-day-for-world-war-ii/
As usual with Trump, when you look into it you realize it's worse than you originally thought:
Trump acknowledged in a Truth Social that “many of our allies and friends” already celebrate on May 8, but said America should join in because “we did more than any other Country, by far, in producing a victorious result.
Man, fuck this guy.
Yes, to all strategic resources - hydro, oil water, telecom, probably even critical minerals.
Manufacturing perceived disagreement is politics 101. However, in this case there's no reason to believe that Carney isn't being sincere. I haven't met anyone that doesn't believe Trudeau fucked that up. Even if he knew it was domed to failure he should have gone ahead. Unless you're predisposed to dislike Carney, there's no reason to assume he isn't holding the same opinion on this as everyone else. Do you know something we don't?
I think this is nearly impossible. I believe it's the most conservative-safe riding in the country.
I'm referring to the fact that he could have made Poilievre wait until November (I think he has up to 6 months). He did not have to do it immediately, it was Carney's decision to make.
Hey, be respectful. This man really put his neck out for his beliefs. He offered himself as tribute to the 2nd amendment, and we should admire his conviction. The proper way to celebrate would be to honour his wishes and show zero empathy. It's the least we can do for him.
It's a rare man that has the courage to rationalize senseless violence in defense of unrestricted access to deadly weapons, and it is even rarer to literally make that the hill you die on. He showed us all by example how you truly live your creed.