Opinionhaver

joined 5 months ago
[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 24 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They couldn't be much more popular than what they already are. Seems that nowdays it's rare to not have any.

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 0 points 5 days ago

By far the best ones have been those that I had not been invited to.

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 50 points 5 days ago (1 children)

my SO actually wears only the bottom of the bikini and goes bra less to the beach, because she says it’s unfair I can free my nipples and she can not

Doesn't sound like she can't.

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 3 points 5 days ago

I only have the beer part of this equation figured out.

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

LLMs have no intentions. They only do what the user asks them to.

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 6 points 6 days ago

Well, I guess that depends on how one defines “rich.” To me, it means someone whose passive income exceeds their spending. What you’re describing, I’d call “wealthy - which is one or two steps above that.

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 3 points 6 days ago

Moderates: Crypto Mommy

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 2 points 6 days ago

Who the heck would pay for someone to come shilling for a product on a platform this niche?

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 3 points 6 days ago

Personally I wouldn't consider that very good. My pair of Haix Airpower P3's lasted me close to 15 years and I've put them through hell.

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're doing a lot of dodging here. The original comment you made wasn’t a neutral “observation” about AI’s impact on cognition - it was a blanket dismissal of people who criticize wokeness by claiming they're bots. That’s textbook ad hominem: attacking the people instead of engaging with what they're saying.

Since then, you’ve shifted the conversation multiple times - from AI and cognition, to whether “worldview” is the right word, to tone and intent - none of which address my original criticism: that dismissing someone as a bot simply for expressing a particular opinion is intellectually lazy and corrosive to actual discussion.

You can claim it's just “an observation” all you want, but the reality is that you made a personal attack in place of an argument. I'm not criticizing you for being mean - I'm criticizing you for sidestepping the discussion entirely.

If you think critics of wokeness are wrong, then show why. Don’t just insult them and pretend that counts as insight.

[–] Opinionhaver@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

As far as I know, many of the judges Trump appointed during his first term are now making rulings against his interests - despite having been seen as “aligned” when appointed. So in other words: you can’t know. Just make sure they’re competent and fit for the task.

view more: ‹ prev next ›