LibertyLizard

joined 2 years ago
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So you want him to become more tolerant, is that your goal?

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I don’t think it’s always necessary or even helpful to sever relationships solely because someone has toxic political beliefs.

I would think more in terms of what problems do you see with this relationship and what actions, if any could potentially solve these problems? What are you trying to achieve by ending this relationship?

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I didn’t read the post (sorry, it was too long and I’m tired) but the fediverse is equally suited to federated islands as to one fediverse, right? Most people will want the full fediverse but people can also create their separate spaces if desired.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

Thanks, I assumed they were centrally created but if they are user customizable this does make it a bit more appealing, although at that point it’s not hugely different from the way subscriptions work now. Could have some use cases though.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Maybe I worded it poorly, I know I can still do my thing, but I’m explaining why I would never use this unless it excluded certain instances.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I don’t want to block the users though, I just don’t want to be subject to their authority. Which means I can’t use their communities. Combining them into one big bag subverts my autonomy to do so.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net -1 points 1 week ago (11 children)

This doesn’t appeal to me at all. The whole point of Lemmy is that I can avoid certain instances that have oppressive admins.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Ironic because bi is the largest queer demographic but also the one that can blend in the easiest which hasn’t forced people to advocate for acceptance.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

How can one accept or reject a thing without understanding what it is they are accepting? Is not immediately changing the way one speaks without a reason or even an explicit request equivalent to denying someone’s identity? I don’t think my discomfort with neopronouns is because I reject anyone’s identity. I don’t even understand what such a person’s identity is. Unlike established pronouns, neopronouns do not have any meaning at all to me because I’ve never heard them before and no one has defined them. What do they signify? I assume something different for each one, so what is it? I’ve always been careful with my language, so using words without a clear understanding of their meaning makes me uncomfortable.

Language is a very meaningful topic for people. Both for the speaker and the spoken to. We have all been acculturated to speak in a certain way, and to understand the meanings of such speech in a certain way. I don’t think asking people to change the way they speak is as trivial as you seem to imply. Nor is declining to change the way one speaks the same as saying “I reject your identity”, unless such a meaning is intended.

And of course I understand that someone may not want to have this (or any) conversation. But I also feel that you can’t expect people to change without them understanding why they need to change. Most people hate change, it’s just human nature. So if you choose not to educate people, you’ll have to accept that they remain ignorant until such time as someone takes on that burden.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Was it dismissing or just not understanding? To be honest my recollection is a bit fuzzy.

I’m a little afraid to be having this conversation lest I be accused of prejudice against trans or nonbinary folks, a prejudice I try my best to fight against. But I don’t even understand the connection there since we already have well-established systems of pronouns for such people.

Personally, I truly can’t fathom why neopronouns are necessary and while I don’t want to disrespect anyone, they are so uncomfortable to use that it just makes me not want to address someone who uses them… especially when they are implicitly linked to having sex with non-human mythological creatures.

But maybe I am just ignorant. Drag was my first introduction to this concept. I’d like to learn more about this.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

I can’t remember the exact details but I believe at least a few people were banned for suggesting that drag was a troll and refusing to use their preferred neopronouns.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

I personally don’t think they were a troll but I am also not sure I agree with banning people for not remembering or wanting to use their unusual pronouns.

But I am not well-educated on the topic of neopronouns so if someone feels like educating me or suggesting some readings I am open to it.

view more: ‹ prev next ›