LesserAbe

I've been reading "The Power Broker" about Bob Moses, who built an insane amount of expressways in New York. This reminds me of multiple instances in the book where he planned the route in a way that didn't seem to make sense until you learned that a powerful or wealthy person stood to gain from doing it that way.

I'd like to see Democrats doing a whole fuck more, but this is a shit analogy.

On this point it makes sense people are eager to explicitly identify slave owning as the primary driver for secession, because it's the truth and there is still an active attempt to cover it up

The lost cause argument is something racist losers came up with after the war where they try to say it was more about states rights (and oh by the way slavery wasn't so bad, many slaves like being slaves)

Some schools still teach this, I went to a "Northern" school and still had textbooks making this argument.

Your post seems to echo this by saying the South's main thing was they wanted to be separate, even though that happened to include slavery, there were other reasons too. That's not the case. When they seceded the south explicitly identified slavery as THE reason why they were doing it.

I've seen you say a few places in this thread that reducing caloric intake is related to eugenics. That's a pretty strong claim to make without any evidence. Can you share any?