LeFantome

joined 2 years ago
[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 1 points 5 days ago

That would be a plot twist. Far more likely is that they go in on it together.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev -1 points 6 days ago

I used to think the problems with Manjaro stemmed from Arch. The I tied EndeavourOS and I thought that EOS was fixing the Arch problems.

Then I tried Arch and realized that all the problems are the result of Manjaro. Arch does not have them. None of the other derivatives have them either.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 0 points 6 days ago

Manjaro is a Trojan Horse.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 4 points 6 days ago

They may team up

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 3 points 6 days ago

It has gotten better in Wayland. I am looking forward to the near future when we can finally stop appending “on Wayland” to everything.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 3 points 6 days ago

You should use what you like.

COSMIC may offer a middle ground if you did want to try something else though.

And KDE is very configurable. It does not have to look like Windows.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The GNU projects that people actually use are primarily hosted, maintained, and developed by Red Hat (IBM). They are the primary code contributors. Not just GPL, GNU specifically.

This is just a fact.

https://sourceware.org/ (Previously known as sources.redhat.com)

There is more permissively licensed code in most Linux distributions than there is GPL code. Not only is that permissive code not being “stolen” by “mega corps” but the majority of it is corporately funded.

Again, just facts. All pretty easy to verify if facts matter at all to you.

What part did not make sense? Just that the facts do not agree with your opinion?

The comment I responded to was stating things that sounded like facts that are not at all supported by the evidence. And if I ask for some, I am pretty sure the cherry-picked examples will be mostly companies “stealing” projects that they wrote to begin with.

The thesis that permissive licenses result in less Open Source code is wrong. In fact, they lead to greater corporate participation and employees write more code than unsponsored individuals. That is what the evidence shows.

Use whatever licenses you want. Not wanting companies to use code you wrote is a totally valid choice. But you should not have to misrepresent reality to convince other people to do the same.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

You are in luck. COSMIC launches in 3 days.

I am also interested to see what kind of adoption COSMIC gets. From the comments I have seen, I looks like it may pull-away a fair number of GNOME users.

Nor sure that COSMIC calendar will have all the features you want. COSMIC is a pretty good base for GNOME apps though. It does not have to be either / or.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you ever want to try Wayland, check out LabWC.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago

I am also loving Niri

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago

Sort of.

Everything is Wayland compatible but there is no XFWM for Wayland. So, you use a Wayland compositor like LabWC with the rest of XFCE running on top of it. This is the default XFCE config on SUSE Leap for example.

XFCE is not quite as far along on portal support as GNOME or KDE though. Depending on your use case, you may still prefer running on Xorg.

You can run the XFCE apps on any Wayland desktop.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hundreds of billions of years should be sufficient t

view more: ‹ prev next ›