If they had gone with my plan of 24 seasons of 24 episodes each then there would have been plenty of room for both!
It's an objectively better plan I don't understand why they didn't listen to me
If they had gone with my plan of 24 seasons of 24 episodes each then there would have been plenty of room for both!
It's an objectively better plan I don't understand why they didn't listen to me
Is one of those people Matt fucking Groening? Because otherwise it's a stupid claim. Did Sean Hannity create the Simpsons?
im not sure if youre joking but matt groening created the simpsons which is a fictional cartoon that premiered on fox broadcasting company, an entirely different company than news corp which created fox news and which existed nearly a decade before the simpsons did.
1980 - News corp created
1989 - The Simpsons airs
why would Matt Groening do this
That alt text is just TOO real
Ohhh I totally misread your comment. Whew!
It will be attacked
If it's not then it's not living up to the Star Trek name IMO!
Dang the musical episode was a major highlight for me 🤷♂️
The LinkedIn-styled writing here is hard for me to get through, but I think the general gist is that for profit platforms are easier to onboard which I agree with. This line stands out:
And what do we get in return? A worse experience than cloud-based services.
I have to disagree somewhat, it's a different experience that is absolutely more difficult in many ways, but for those of us who value privacy, control over our data, and don't like ads, the trade-off is worth it. Also it goes without saying that the usability of selfhosted apps has exploded in the past few years and it will likely become less and less of an issue.
Fortunately "groupthink" on the fediverse isn't a structural problem since nobody controls all instances and every instance has different moderation styles.
It's pretty great lol