Ok, and how are you going to tell people that it exists? Not through YouTube sponsor slots, because you'll get deleted quicker than you put it up.
So only a tiny number of people will know that your VPN exists. That's "good enough" for the censorious.
If you can block access to commercial VPNs and render anyone else using VPNs liable to prosecution you achieve what they want.
Someone doesn't know what OCD is
Dividing between providers is not what people would be doing if the resilience of cloud services were as is being memed about.
Doing so is phenomenally expensive.
If American ranchers are struggling to produce competitive beef, why is that a problem? It's not a critical good; just import it and let the industry shrink.
If as you say it's domestic producers maintaining the price high by restricting supply, imports will encourage them to increase supply.
On these scales, the accuracy of our observations should reduce our confidence though. It doesn't make sense to confidently say that, in 200 trillion years there will be no stars, because our observations of the rate of new matter creation (approximately zero) have a margin of error which allows for there to still be some
Lemmy doesn't have that many users... How are you going to reach the people who aren't arch users ;)
Seriously though, tech enthusiasts live a technological solution but a ban is a societal thing and it doesn't have to be perfect. Look at China.