EnsignWashout

joined 2 years ago
[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 3 points 4 months ago

Just so you know, this isn't Reddit. You've just been blocked by everyone reading along here.

If you start to feel like no one replies here, it's actually you, in this case. It could help to try again with a new account.

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 6 points 4 months ago

Sure some people might say hi back but that doesn't mean they're a friend.

True. But I've had some great friendships grow after years of just "hi" in passing. We weren't friends yet, but we were destined to become friends.

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 4 points 4 months ago

I'm with you.

Thankfully, corporate bullahit isn't the only way to create a discovery algorithm.

I expect that we will have a diverse set of discovery algorithms available to opt into here, in a few years.

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Any politician launching their own media network is a reprehensible piece of shit.

Prove me wrong.

Counterpoint?Obviously I don't have any examples here.

I'm sorry if I got anyone's hope's up

I hope this was a brief, fun, moment of mystery for a few of us.

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 10 points 4 months ago (6 children)

A manufacturer phone pre-installed with LineageOS would be awesome.

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Voiding all IP law would cause a huge loss in the creative community.

I agree. I wouldn't be in favor of "burn it down" if I thought we could negotiate better terms with our current IP oligarchs.

If people can no longer pay their bills by creating then they stop creating and work.

I'll still be available to do creative work. It wouldn't change my current work-for-hire efforts.

Very little valuable IP is held by actual creators, today.

Why dump years and your heart and soul into a great book just to have it distributed for free and be poor.

Are you an actual published creator, or a temporarily embarrassed future billionaire? Is there a version of success for you that isn't just selling to a big IP company to get enough money to retire? That's what it looks like, to me. The peak of my possible success would be to write something that threatens/tempts the big IP holders enough to force them to buy me out. If I don't take the buy out, they eventually bury my thing with their advertising power.

I don't really disagree with you. I'm actually in favor of keeping and fixing IP laws, if that's possible.

But I believe the IP laws we have now only serve our billionaire employers. So, as a creator, I won't fight to keep our current IP laws.

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Your utopia is every creator's nightmare.

I didn't say "utopia". We need IP laws. But since we continue to let Disney (and other mega corporations) dictate the entire terms of engagement - we need to bring "burning the whole thing down and starting over" into the list of options under consideration. It's the only way to bring Disney back to the bargaining table, at minimum.

Edit: A more practical approach would be to disolve every company that has engaged in an illegal merger (most large US companies). But I think that's actually harder to accomplish, today, than voiding all IP law. It's a better option, if we can swing it. The necessary laws are already on the books, they're simply un-enforced.

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 5 points 5 months ago

Is also very very queer tho JSYK

That could be our new Lemmy slogan.

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 22 points 5 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (7 children)

There's a couple of them, I think.

I found this one:

https://lemmy.ca/c/witchesvspatriarchy

Edit: Better link:

!witchesvspatriarchy@lemmy.ca

Thanks!

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 2 points 5 months ago

Also doesn't the GPL use IP law for enforcement of copy left?

That's very probably Jack Dorsey's motive in this. Briefly void all IP law, then restore it in a messy way that leaves everything owned by his lawyers.

view more: ‹ prev next ›