Archangel1313

joined 3 weeks ago
[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 15 points 1 week ago

Of course he does. That's how it works. You show him that you're weak, and he'll keep taking advantage of you.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago

So, they're shutting down actual research in order to rehash this bullshit for the hundredth time?

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Oops. There goes the US communications tech industry, I guess.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 66 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So, is he seriously telling other countries not to just blindly go along with whatever the US tells them to do, but instead to resist and stand up for themselves?

And Trump is ok with this messaging? Hmmm.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

Can we not just use the original definition, instead? It worked fine for decades, until right-wingers decided to reinvent it in order to push their propaganda.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

Oh, I didn't mean to imply that they should "always" be prosecuted for their crimes...only that the Supreme Court should have closed that loophole. There are many ways they could have drawn a distinction between justified actions and those that should be prosecuted.

Instead, they ruled that all "official acts" should be exempt from repercussions. That didn't just leave the loophole open...it guaranteed it could be abused, without consequence.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

Ooh, ooh...I did that.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago

Is this his latest effort to convince us he's not like Trump?

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago
[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

I don't think they understand how strategic voting works, then. If they have a candidate that has a reasonable chance to beat the Conservative candidate...then strategically speaking, they should be the go-to pick for anyone not voting Conservative.

They should be promoting this. It should keep all of their current incumbents in their seats, and maybe even win a few more in contested ridings.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 89 points 1 week ago (4 children)

In clear violation of the 1st amendment.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee -1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So, all those research papers were written by AI? Huh.

view more: ‹ prev next ›