Trophic Cascade would be a cool band namr
AnarchistArtificer
joined 2 years ago
"looking for a woman to play out the guy's MFF fantasy"
Sometimes the driving force is a bi-curious woman. What usually happens is that the boyfriend agrees to it because he sees a MDF threesome as being hot, and sapphic love as being less real or serious. Then he freaks out during/after the hookup because of insecurity he feels when seeing his girlfriend enthusiastically making out with a woman. I've learned the unpleasant way that it's no fun to be unicorn hunted.
The worst part is when they try to hide what they're doing. I once only found out a woman had a boyfriend and that they were looking for a MFF threesome on the third date. Trying to hide their intentions is gross because it shows they have some awareness of how people don't like being instrumentalised in this way.
This isn't really relevant to your question at all, but you reminded me of a (male) friend who is a gynecologist and married to a woman. I expected that the professional context would nullify any potential arousal towards his patients, but what I was curious about was whether this might bleed over into his personal life — i.e. did he still find his partner's vulva arousing, or does it put him into doctor-headspace. Apparently his profession causes no problems whatsoever in his sex life, because the compartmentalisation is so strong.
He said that it feels almost like conceptual homonyms. For example, in the sentence "up past the river bank is the bank where I deposited my money", the word "bank" appears twice but means two very different things. Similarly, a vulva is a vulva no matter the context, but the meaning of it differs so much depending on the context that his brain literally doesn't parse them as being the same.
Like I say, it's not related to your question, but I thought you might find it cool nonetheless. I would expect that firefighters would show a similar ability to compartmentalise, but perhaps the high-stress context of smelling human flesh may cause it to work differently.
See, this is a thing that I do not want (and have not even read the article in the linked post due to this). However, I gotta say that your recommendation has me intrigued (over recent years, I have been trying to be more mindful of who is writing the various bits of non-fiction that I enjoy (especially journalists), so your mentioning this person's name sticks out to me)
Sad to hear you've had a rough time, glad to hear that you're back.
Fucking hell, I love these cool people
"But previous attempts at banning them have failed because such an official report was missing."
Man, this is peak modern society, and the absurdity makes me laugh. I don't mean that in a derisive way, more in a "wow, making democracy work is haaard ". Hopefully this will lead to something positive though, even if I'm anxious that banning a party like the AfD may lead to some things worsening.
Where did you get those stats from? I wasn't aware there were places where you could see such granular numbers
Oh yeah, I read about this. I get the impression that they're out of the proof of concept stage, based on a few places where it's worked well; it seems like capacity is on its way upwards now
I did an internship at a bank way back, and my role involved a lot of processing of spreadsheets from different departments. I automated a heckton of that with Visual Basic, which my boss was okay with, but I was dismayed to learn that I wasn't saving anyone's time except my own, because after the internship was finished, all of the automation stuff would have to be deleted. The reason was because of a rule (I think a company policy rather than a law) that required that any code has to be the custody of someone, for accountability purposes — "accountability" in this case meaning "if we take unmaintained code for granted, then we may find an entire department's workflow crippled at some point in the future, with no-one knowing how it's meant to work".
It's quite a different thing than what you're talking about, but in terms of the implementation, it doesn't seem too far off.
It reminds me of how apparently firing squad executions used to have only some of the guns loaded with live guns, and the rest with blanks. This way, the executioners could do some moral gymnastics to convince themselves that they hadn't just killed a person
Archive link for anyone who finds this useful https://archive.ph/E7XFt
Edit: Have read the article and daaamn, this is ridiculous. Thanks for sharing this, I hadn't seen it yet.