AnalogNotDigital

joined 2 months ago
[–] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You realize that athletes are exceptionally intelligent in different ways than people pecking at a keyboard all day, right?

Athletes are not dumb. Take a look at a football playbook. You going to remember all of that, be able to recall it, and then also know all the audible changes to a play that you have to make? Are you able to make split second decisions for 60 minutes while wearing knives on your feet like a hockey player? Do you have the hand eye coordination to hit a 94 mile per hour fast ball, but know that the pitcher you're facing also has a 35% chance to throw an 82 mph sinker?

Acting like you have one kind of intelligence and shitting on people who have different kinds of intelligence just makes you look like you're jealous.

[–] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 5 points 1 month ago (5 children)

That's just a byproduct of how popular and in demand sports are for people to consume.

And here's the kicker. For their worth, athletes are still underpaid for what they bring in the owners.

[–] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 4 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I've been an athlete my whole life. I don't get why more tech savvy people have this absolute disdain for people who enjoy sports. Like, I get it, maybe some of the athletes at your school picked on you. Sweet. I was an athlete and ALSO got picked on by people. Constantly. I'm in my 30's now, and stopped dwelling on that shit in college. Move on, you know?

[–] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 9 points 1 month ago (14 children)

There's an easier way to just say you suck at physical things.

Posting something like this just makes you look really bitter.

[–] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 5 points 1 month ago

Yeah, and you'd think that even leftists would agree that having the people in charge that want cheaper college, and cheaper medicine/healthcare would be the better option, even if (from their lens) they are a right wing party.

[–] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sure. My point stands. A leftist will get 30-50% of what they want with a Democrat in office compared to 0% of what they want.

A toddler can work out it's better that you get a small portion of what you want, instead of nothing. It's really that simple.

[–] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 24 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I'll give you a huge one.

Purity tests (when cosplaying as liberals). If a person isn't super-duper liberal on every single issue then you can't support them.

There's tons of this on this very site. People who will tell you they'll stay home and not vote for someone, if they only support 80% of what they seemingly want. People see this, then emulate said behavior.

Somehow, liberals would rather get 0% of what they want instead of 50% because of the missed 30% that the candidate doesn't support.

[–] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 12 points 1 month ago

Nothing of value was lost here.

[–] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 3 points 1 month ago

Last I saw, Squadron 42 (the single player version of the game) is function complete and undergoing optimization, but SC the multiplayer game will never be finished in my mind.

[–] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 7 points 1 month ago

As someone who has exactly one ship in the game, it's not 'bad' if you just want to go 'live a space life' and do stuff like that.

It's cool you can go do stuff in-world and not have loading screens, and just fly around ships doing trading, PVE missions, or doing space stuff, it's enjoyable. There's not much else to it, but if that's what you expect it's fun.

I don't get the cultists thinking they're playing the game in some future state where it's anything more than that, though. I spent like.... fuck, maybe 100 bucks? For the hours I put in, I enjoyed it but I'd never put in the 10s of thousands of dollars other people have dumped into this game.

[–] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Red states voted for this. Fuck em.

view more: ‹ prev next ›