this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2025
199 points (96.7% liked)

politics

26872 readers
2077 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Greene gives lengthy interview with New York Times days before stepping down as congresswoman for Georgia

Marjorie Taylor Greene, now just days away from stepping down as a congresswoman for Georgia, has said in her latest mea culpa interview that she “was just so naive” for believing that Donald Trump was a man of the people.

In a lengthy interview with the New York Times that examines her break with the president after years of devotion, Greene explained that a series of minor ruptures with the president culminated in a total breach after conservative influencer Charlie Kirk was killed in September.

The third-term Georgia congresswoman said she was watching Kirk’s memorial service on TV when his widow Erika said she forgave her husband’s killer. But then Trump took the stage to say that unlike Kirk – “a missionary with a noble spirit” who did not “hate” his opponents, Trump said he disagreed.

“I hate my opponent, and I don’t want the best for them,” Trump said.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] the_tab_key@lemmy.world 107 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Naive my ass. She knew exactly who he was the whole time. It was just her turn to get vilified and boohoo, how could he do this TO ME?!?! Leopards, yada yada

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 23 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

I could give her the benefit of the doubt, she seems extremely stupid. Doesn't excuse anything she's done or said though

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 11 points 7 hours ago

I don't think she's as stupid as people make her out to be.

She's shown herself to be relatively adept at playing her political hand, doing things that will play well to her constituency while making money on insider trading. She timed her resignation to make sure she still draws a Congressional pension.

[–] pilferjinx@piefed.social 4 points 3 hours ago

She's actually quite brilliant in the manipulation department. The fact you're giving her the benefit of a doubt displays how good at it she truly is.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

You're doing that thing where you think everyone is the same as you. And you saw it coming.

Some people saw it earlier, some saw it later, some still havent seen it.

But empathy isn't a weakness it's a strength. So please stop acting like a Republican and understand our opponents even if the only reason is it helps us win.

What you're doing now hurts our chances of winning, even though that's probably not your intent you're helping trump.

[–] hungprocess@thriv.social 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Username checks out.

While I agree with the broad strokes of what you're saying about empathy, it's important to remember that people like this (or if we're being generous, the people she was like until just now) see empathy from their adversaries as a weakness to be exploited.

One can be empathetic without being a naive chump. When anyone has caused the amount of harm MTG has, forgiveness comes only after they have atoned. If she puts half as much money and effort into repairing the damage she's done as she put into causing the damage in the first place, then and only then can we talk about letting bygones be bygones.

If that atonement never materializes (and call me a cynic but I doubt it will) then this is just the same old conservative playbook of "now that I've stomped all over other people to get what I want, it's time for togetherness".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MBech@feddit.dk 5 points 6 hours ago (6 children)

You're doing that thing where you believe what a republican is saying. This bitch has learned nothing, but has realized she has more to gain by breaking ranks. She is abusing your empathy, and you are letting her. Stop it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] rustyfish@piefed.world 72 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

After meeting with victims, she claimed, Trump called her and yelled “my friends will get hurt” if the files were released.

His friends and him.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Are you kidding? His only other friend was already hurt by this, they killed themselves.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 6 points 5 hours ago

Who killed themselves? Sure as shit wasn't Epstein, Epstein did not kill himself.

[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 14 points 8 hours ago

Epstein is the only person who's ever called Trump, "friend".
And, where is he now?

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

That's his only friend.

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 55 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I wanna make this abundantly clear:

MTG was fully aware of and supportive of every single fucking thing Trump has done, promised to do, and will do.

This is all a facade and she is only undertaking it because she is part of the population of GOP politicians that is no longer confident Trump can steal the 2026 and 2028 elections.

[–] DNS@discuss.online 17 points 4 hours ago

Not just that, but because she lost her standing within Trump's circle. She's being pushed out hence why she's suddenly acting like this. She'll still support Republican policy that is rooted in racism, misogyny, and bigotry as long as she has more power than she previously had.

She's still a Nazi.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 31 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The giveaways to billionaires were pretty subtle if you have oatmeal for brains.

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 14 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

the word "giveaway" implies he's giving them something he already had-- no, he's literally robbing the 99% in order to pay the 1%

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Robfefehood

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 27 points 4 hours ago

Green said that her turn away from unrepentant Maga acolyte came in that moment and she abandoned her training “to never apologize and to never admit when you’re wrong”.

I'm sorry, are we all just glossing over the casual mention that there's MAGA training to never apologize or admit you're wrong? I assumed this was their unofficial playbook, but this is the first I've ever heard of an actual training being mentioned.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 27 points 6 hours ago

She has stated repeatedly that her political opponents are evil devil worshippers who should be executed. Nothing she says should ever be taken as legitimate or true.

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.zip 20 points 6 hours ago

NYT giving this cunt a platform. Fuck right on off.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 17 points 7 hours ago

Try "willfully ignorant" or " maliciously stupid".

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 14 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

She went from a net worth of about 300k to over 20 million in 5 years. Totally normal on a public servant salary.

[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 14 points 8 hours ago

"naive" isn't the same as "willfully-ignorant".

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 11 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

You're not naive, you're an evil, ignorant, opportunistic waste of skin & oxygen that knew she could get rich riding on Trump's populist coattails & is now jumping ship like the other rats since he's shown his true face & 1/2 of his moronic base finally figured out that they are in fact the baddies.

[–] velindora@lemmy.cafe 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Meet the 2028 presidential candidate lol

[–] Red0ctober@lemmy.world 13 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Between her and JD Couch Fucker, they've got a HOT bench /s

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 17 points 8 hours ago (5 children)

Don't worry. The Democrats will come up with a totally useless ticket that will make them seem viable. My money is on Cuomo/Sinema or something equally atrocious.

[–] Red0ctober@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago (2 children)
[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

Newsom and Hochul

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

The only way they could pick someone as VP that is more reviled by nearly everyone would be to pick Kyrsten Sinema. Who started in the Green Party, by the way. Being affiliated with that party should probably be considered a red flag at this point.

Maybe Kirsten Gillibrand is nearly as toxic, for those that remember her when it comes to Al Franken.

Between Fetterman, Sinema, Cuomo, and Gillibrand it's hard to pick which one is more annoying.

[–] handsoffmydata@lemmy.zip 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

They’ll run a Clinton/Occasio-Cortez ticket for the bulk of the year and then change it to Newsom/Cuomo in the last three weeks. If anyone can snatch defeat from the jaws of victory it’s the opposition party we call the Democrats.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Don't you think Cuomo would be just a bit too obvious, even assuming your conspiracy theory of Democrats trying to lose is true?

[–] handsoffmydata@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Democrats trying to lose is as much a conspiracy theory as gravity is the force that keeps you from floating away when you jump in the air.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Vote in the primary, it's our best shot to have a fair one since Carter.

A lot of people are going to try and convince people not to vote in the Dem primary because of that.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

That would require these people to do something more than just bitch into the void. Might be a bridge too far for them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] homes@piefed.world 11 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Strange way to spell “opportunistic sleaze”…

Despite her protestations, when you realize that this is what she really means, you will also realize that she has not changed at all.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago

How much is NYT being paid to rehabilitate her image?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago

LOL, the idea that any Republican is going to be a man of the people is just hilarious.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 hours ago

Trump called her and yelled “my friends will get hurt” if the files were released.

Trump admits his friends are pedophiles and/or sex traffickers.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 4 points 8 hours ago

You don't say.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 3 points 54 minutes ago
[–] nostrauxendar@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

No, no, stop it. She was horrible before this turnaround, horrible before she was in Congress, and horrible before Trump. No rehabilitation for somebody so clearly malicious without some serious and real work - not just vague and obvious words. Actions. Hard work and effort. She is not reformed. She's grifting. Stop.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 2 points 33 minutes ago

Was she naive about Jewish space lasers, controlling the weather or the parkland shootings too?

[–] L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Oh neat. They are capable of learning. That's a huge step forward.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

They are not.

load more comments
view more: next ›