Bomber is a Trumper.
quelle suprise!!!
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Bomber is a Trumper.
quelle suprise!!!
Was that ever actually in doubt? There are crazies on both sides, of course, but most of them and virtually all the violent ones are on the right.
Wait, the call is coming from inside the house, and you are telling me it is NOT a trans antifa ACORN BLM person?
Also: not "openly political". Who could possibly guess at what his political views might be? Believes total bullshit about an election, placing pipe bombs and going to a protest in support of Taco....gosh, I guess we'll just never fucking know. Let's chalk this up to being aN iNdEpEnDeNt.
And where might they have gotten election conspiracy theories, I wonder.
Aren't those election conspiracy theories basically government policy these days?
Yeah, I was honestly wondering what an election conspiracy theory could possibly be coming from Kash Patel's FBI.
Pardon incoming…
I'm pretty sure the way Trump wrote the pardon for Jan 6th (extremely vaguely) means this guy will get a pardon.
He wrote it to pardon future criminals? That sounds legal. /s
It is actually legal. We know he used the pardon in a corrupt way, but the pardon being upheld for people who haven't gone through court yet has legal precedent dating back to the civil war.
I guess laws matters more when it works to advantage of party supported by conservative justices of SCOTUS.
Is that how the justice department characterized it?