this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
523 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

78060 readers
3338 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Low-quality AI-generated content is now saturating social media – and generating about $117m a year, data shows

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] saltnotsugar@lemmy.world 87 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It’s probably going to get worse before it gets better. The YouTube algorithm favors low effort frequent posting, so AI slop is perfect for the platform.

[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago

Every algorithm is based around frequent posting and farming engagement. Everything is optimized to ruin the internet.

[–] DozensOfDonner@mander.xyz 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wait that means YouTube might be dying? Im actually mildly happy with that, maybe it ruins their Monopoly and opens the web for smaller niche platforms (not sure how they would survive AI but if they don't reward low effort high freq it might be something?)

[–] Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)

For it to die there has to be an alternative for the content. I don't see anything that could replace it at the moment.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago
[–] pentastarm@piefed.ca 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] blaue_Fledermaus@olio.cafe 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Peertube still needs improvements to start looking attractive.

While it is technically federated, using it still feels like it's just a bunch of small disjointed sites.

[–] pentastarm@piefed.ca 8 points 1 day ago

That's fair. I just hope mentioning and drawing more people to the platform helps (or provides incentive) for it to improve.and become a viable YouTube replacement. Or at least a supplement to something better than YouTube.

[–] mech@feddit.org 2 points 16 hours ago

I tried to upload a video to a Peertube instance once.
Took me a solid hour to figure out how to do that.
The link to it 404d the next day.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] j_elgato@leminal.space 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not until we make our own video hosting site - with blackjack and hookers!

[–] Laser@feddit.org 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean peertube exists, and it actually integrates into the fediverse...

[–] nocturne@piefed.social 2 points 16 hours ago

But does it integrate blackjack and hookers?

[–] saltnotsugar@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

In fact, let’s forget the video hosting site.

[–] manualoverride@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I’ve stopped watching YouTube shorts because of this, and the removal of the downvote count makes it harder to tell.

[–] itsathursday@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

0 people liked the removal of the dislike button.

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 16 hours ago

Wdym

No one disliked the removal of the dislike button, how would they if it's removed

[–] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why would you ever watch shorts in the first place? First thing I did when they appeared was make a ublock filter to hide them.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Considering a lot of the full YouTube videos are full of padding, taking over ten minutes to get to the point, I can understand why the shorts would have appeal.

Problem is one way or another people are being incentivized to target a specific runtime regardless of whether they have the material to fit.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 day ago

"Stay tuned for part 2"

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I just skip those. There's almost always a better one that was easy to find.

[–] dmtalon@infosec.pub 5 points 1 day ago

100% this I do everything I can to ignore shorts

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

I will never pay for youtube while the downvote count is gone. Absolute anti consumer bullshit.

I do use the add-on to bring them back, but fuck those assholes for doing this.

And hiding the date the video is from, Youtube is getting worse.

[–] flameleaf@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Am I the only one who sticks to subscriptions? It feels like everyone is just consuming whatever the algorithm feeds them

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Can't find new content just sticking to subscriptions unfortunately

[–] mech@feddit.org 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

You can find new content by asking for channel recommendations on lemmy.
Fuck the algorithms, talk to real people. That's how it used to work.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Manosphere fanfic everywhere.

[–] Pringles@sopuli.xyz 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

2 years ago I went to youtube without logging into my account. The amount of right wing manosphere crap being recommended to new accounts was frightening. Within 5 minutes there was a video playing of how women should be subservient to men because their role is basically a house cleaning baby factory with no free will.

I genuinely think google should be sued the everliving shit out of them for allowing this crap to be pushed. They looked at what facebook did and went "Oh, that's great. Let's do that as well!"

[–] Medic8teMe@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I just went there after years of avoidance because my kids are there are lot. I needed to see. They're not there anymore. Manosphere, I hate those different than me, racism, outright hatred. It's fucked.

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

I don't regularly use it, but I run into yt in search results every now and then. If I've looked, the front page and lots of recommends have always looked like cancer, I've never seen anything like that. Could it be a localized thing?

[–] pageflight@piefed.social 18 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Tell your favorite content creators to get over to Nebula. Or are there better options?

[–] sobchak@programming.dev 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Peertube, but requires taking care of monetization/donations themselves, and possibly needing to run their own instance(?). Discovery sucks (I think Peertube may be anti-algo similar to Mastodon) so they'll have to take care of promoting themselves as well.

I think Nebula is a creator-owned platform, so very hard to get into. I've also seen that their privacy policy is not good.

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 16 hours ago

They don't need to run an instance

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

I use freetube to kinda help deal with it but it is still a real issue. Even something like internet browser comparison videos are filed with AI voice overs and no real human input.

[–] itsathursday@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

“Generating” $117m, or allocating ad revenue and watch hours to these videos? Because it sounds like businesses will pay for advertisements to see numbers go up, and if numbers go up then people think ads are working. This whole economy is stupid because unless the money is coming from a consumer then it’s false. If the only thing being consumed is content, the ads are simply a hurdle that people love to keep throwing in the way and propping up this shit content. At some point market economics needs to win and balance things out and advertisers need to check their ROI, but that will never happen because new metrics will be made to justify the marketing teams or 3rd party consultants these companies are paying to put out these ads.

If there was a filter for “unmonetised” this house of cards would fall on its ass. Real people uploading real content to share for real consumers to enjoy and view.

[–] mech@feddit.org 10 points 16 hours ago

At least another 50% are actual humans narrating AI slop.

[–] brotato@slrpnk.net 8 points 18 hours ago

Honestly, Youtube was already pretty shit with all of the obvious monetization schemes and paid “influencer” content. Even though I never watch reaction videos I feel like they are always recommended to me. Their algorithms were already busted to prefer user-created slop. This is just another step towards complete enshittification.

Go to FB where it must be around 40%

Horrendous amounts of BS on X, Facebook, Insta, TikTok, etc. Applies to ' news ', images and videos.

[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Why it wouldn't be? You ask AI, you generate with AI, you replace humans with AI an you also watch AI.\ Wait till they change news anchors with AI.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Solenopsis@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

Blocktube is a necessity now. I had to swap back to firefox, despite preferring Brave a lot more, because without the ability to block channels, Youtube quickly becomes unusable.

load more comments
view more: next ›