this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2025
117 points (99.2% liked)

PC Gaming

13021 readers
500 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ElectricAirship@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

RIP people who leave the game running in the background

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Can't do that on GFN either, it'll boot you after like 10 minutes of idle, and you lose your progress. I tried their early founders deal and that was an annoyance, could hardly use the bathroom without finding a save point first.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Really? I tried Amazon Luna once, and while it would end the stream after some number of minutes, you could resume it right where you left off. It only closed the game entirely after a significant amount of time.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Maybe it's better these days, but yeah they simply logged out tearing down the whole virtual machine

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 16 hours ago

you would think it would go into some sort of hibernation.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This seems like one of those problems that I'm too privileged to have since I don't have this service nor know anybody who did.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

I tried it to play a few games. I've had some controller issues and then the quality and frame rate seems really bad for me. I know it was great for others, but I don't know what settings I needed to get a smooth game going.

I was actually interested in this service because I felt like building a gaming PC for just a few games I play once in a while outside of my Steam Deck could be worth it.

[–] wccrawford@discuss.online 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I think it really depends on circumstances. I tried GFN and Stadia, and found them to be adequate, and used Stadia for a few months. After comparing input latency with streaming from myself (across town) and playing locally, I decided it wasn't worth it and left Stadia. I'm still mad at their ridiculous promises that they broke, and killing the service without ever really trying to hit its potential.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I felt Stadia had potential but I also thought they should have tried a game subscription model rather than the one they went with.

I very recently tried Expedition 33 with GFN and I tried turning the graphics all the way down and the lag seemed unbearable. It very well could be me, but I have a fibre optic connection with typically low ping. It could just be where I'm situated or maybe there's more configuration I didn't figure out. I know others still like and use the service.

[–] wccrawford@discuss.online 2 points 10 hours ago

I was playing Destiny 2 and the lag was only noticeable to me when I compared it to not using Stadia. While I was playing, I didn't feel like there was anything to complain about.

I think I saw less lag when connected to my house over Parsec, and definitely had less lag when playing locally at my house. I actually considered continuing to use Stadia, but by that point they had pretty much proven that they were not going to bother improving things further, and it didn't make sense to pay for a service that didn't provide an advantage over what I could do for free.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

at one point in time they had a free tier or something. not sure if it still does. Honestly if I was subscribing to something monthly I could see this over streaming services.

[–] wccrawford@discuss.online 2 points 13 hours ago

IIRC, there's still a free tier with a limit of 1 hour playtime at a time, and you can't play during peak hours because there won't be a slot for you.

The pay tier is still a 6 hour limit, but of course you can just come right back in.

[–] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 20 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Wait, you are telling me that yet another monthly service is making their offering...

*checks notes

... WORSE?!

[–] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago

Also, before announcing their streaming platform, they disabled the feature where you can stream from your real PC. It was called nvidia Gamestream and has been revived by the "Sunshine" and"Moonlight" projects. It works great, even over the internet. Only adding 7-10ms with a wired connection. I've used it myself for years.

So without the Sunlight and Moonlight projects they would have succeeded in killing the superior technology which would have competed with the one you have to pay monthly for.

[–] theit8514@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Was about to say it always had this but I guess it is a change to the people who were grandfathered in. I personally haven't hit this limit but I only use it for a select few games that don't run natively or well on Linux.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 hours ago

Stop subscribing to bullshit and control your habits. Personally, I buy old shit on sale which was a hit 10 years ago and that fills my cup. Fuck this subscription culture.