this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2025
429 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

65750 readers
613 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We backed up Spotify (metadata and music files). It’s distributed in bulk torrents (~300TB), grouped by popularity.

This release includes the largest publicly available music metadata database with 256 million tracks and 186 million unique ISRCs.

It’s the world’s first “preservation archive” for music which is fully open (meaning it can easily be mirrored by anyone with enough disk space), with 86 million music files, representing around 99.6% of listens.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.sdf.org 105 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

damn, annas is fucking based. hope they stay safe..

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I fucking love annas archive. Anna does seem rather insane though

[–] deltaspawn0040@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 hours ago

C'mon you gotta say why im curious

[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 59 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

After Meta scraped all their books they have the perfect defense now. All they have to say is "we're training a music AI" and they're apparently untouchable.

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Well, they have to say "we're training a music AI" while slipping several million dollars into the pockets of the right people. Rich people don't win legal battles by actually proving what they did isn't illegal, they do it by discreetly paying people to say they did.

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 2 points 1 hour ago

Often and increasingly they are not bothering with the discretion part anymore.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 39 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

Anyone knows if spotify metadata have BPM and keys?

[–] Jerkface@piefed.social 32 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Would love lmao. Just bought a second hand VDJ and I'm starting to experiment with mixxx, and I don't know is the style I like (latincore and adjacents) or if the BPM detected of mixxx isn't that good.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 hours ago

Good on you for starting that up! I wish you much success in your mixing and/or producing journey!

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 27 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Both. Per the SQL schema printed in the article, table track_audio_features has both fields tempo and key along with many other technicals. Worth checking out, it's near the bottom of the page.

[–] napkin2020@sh.itjust.works 7 points 17 hours ago

BPM yes, keys I'm not so sure.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] studentofarkad@lemmy.zip 30 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

Are these the actual music files you can use to play as well?

[–] notgold@aussie.zone 36 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Would be amazing if it was. I would love to just have Spotify's music on my nas

[–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 40 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

I'd wager 70% of what's on Spotify is not worth preserving since its AI slop.

[–] nagaram@startrek.website 50 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not convinced AI slop can compete with the back log of organic slop personally.

But yeah a fuckton is probably slop either way

[–] bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 hours ago

AI slop is accelerating exponentially for the foreseeable future. It won't take long for world data storage to be a limiting factor.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 11 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah as with most of the internet, it’s only worth downloading anything uploaded before 2023.

So far, LLMs have done so much more harm than help.

That's what they're for.

[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 14 hours ago

Interestingly enough, with the data they provide, figuring out how much of it is AI slop wouldn't be that hard I think

[–] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone 20 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

If your nas has 300tb spare, you could.

[–] sopularity_fax@sopuli.xyz 11 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

How much could it cost $10,000

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 14 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] oyo@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 hours ago

This gif is going to completely lose its punch in a couple years.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 8 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

A RAID6 of 24 * 20TB drives could contain that with both parity and hotswap, with room to spare. Let's say $400 per refurb drive, $2500 rackmount SAS enclosure, $2000 SAS RAID card, $14,100 total. Assuming you already have the server and power and SAS cables.

[–] BlueRingedOctopus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Considering the Price per TB is 10-11 US dollars, it's gonna cost $3500 max

[–] sopularity_fax@sopuli.xyz 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

Is it that cheap now?? I would kill for 10tb

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 7 points 15 hours ago

It's nowhere near that cheap.

[–] rainwall@piefed.social 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

Here you go mate. They dont have 10TB in stock, but the do have 20TB refurbs at around $15/TB.

[–] notgold@aussie.zone 3 points 14 hours ago

I read it as 30tb in my head. 300tb is a bit more than i can manage

[–] Jerkface@piefed.social 19 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

The article claims that they are:

We backed up Spotify (metadata and music files).

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 6 points 7 hours ago

They've released torrents of the metadata, and they plan to release the music files, but they haven't yet. They intend to start by offering the downloads as bulk torrents, but they're open to considering implementing the ability to download single songs in the future.

So in short, yes, but you can't download them yet

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 19 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Does anyone see the torrent links?

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 33 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

It says,

The data will be released in different stages on our Torrents page:

[X] Metadata (Dec 2025)

[ ] Music files (releasing in order of popularity)

[ ] Additional file metadata (torrent paths and checksums)

[ ] Album art

[ ] .zstdpatch files (to reconstruct original files before we added embedded metadata)

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 11 points 15 hours ago

Yeah, I saw that and assumed they'd be torrents of the metadata.

[–] SlimePirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Now make it streamable and make a stremio-like music client 🤞

[–] Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip 26 points 17 hours ago

Record labels themselves would march on foot to burn down the archives

[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 7 hours ago (2 children)
[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 hours ago

Does DoH work? (Secure DNS in firefox's settings)

[–] philpo@feddit.org 1 points 22 minutes ago

Simply choose a private DNS server like mullvad,quad,etc. and it should work..

[–] upstroke4448@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Does this make Anna's Archive the top music tracker now? Lol move over RED

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 7 points 19 hours ago (6 children)

I wonder why Spotify and not YouTube Music, Tidal or Apple Music all of which are higher quality.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Spotify has lossless now. Although if you're listening on anything with Bluetooth then you probably won't notice anyway.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 hours ago

Spotify claims to offer lossless quality on much of their catalog; is this claim false or is there something more I'm missing here?

[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 hours ago

They were trying to keep file sizes down.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

Is that ALL off the songs?

load more comments
view more: next ›