this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
107 points (97.3% liked)

politics

26757 readers
2517 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 108 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

The story going around is that the Republican women of Congress are in open revolt because they've been sidelined and ignored by leadership and the President.

White women discover their status doesn't overrule misogyny. More at 11.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 19 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Have they tried getting back in the kitchen and having babies?

  • The GOP
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 15 hours ago

The dream of every tradwife, surely.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

We’re (not) sorry, but to ride ‘Mister trump’s Wild Ride’ you must be:

  • white
  • male
  • Christian (fake is preferred)
  • wealthy
[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)
[–] JackDark@lemmy.world 67 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Republican, for those that are wondering.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 59 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Not just any Republican, she was Trump's nominee for UN Ambassador, until that got withdrawn because the Republicans were losing too many House seats to Presidential appointments.

So, she decided to run for Governor, until a better connected male candidate decided to run instead, so she backed out of that.

It seems like her entire year can be summed up by getting screwed over by other Republicans. No wonder she wants out.

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like it really sucks to be her.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 5 points 17 hours ago

I mean it’s really been all unforced errors, so no one to blame but herself

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 15 hours ago

Sigh, fine. Let me find my tiny violin…

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 25 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Another indication that the GOP expects a Blue Wave in 2026.

[–] droopy4096@lemmy.ca 8 points 19 hours ago

it does have that aftertaste, doesn't it? Given Mamdani win there's a chance she did the math and figured that indeed spending time and energy in place where she's doomed to lose is counterproductive. Or it could be that she's been informed to not interfere in Big Boys' game so she decided to bow out.

[–] astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz 22 points 19 hours ago

I have a sneaking suspicion that there will be more GOP reps who will be looking to "spend more time with their families" in the coming months.

[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 15 points 15 hours ago

Good fucking riddance traitor

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago
[–] ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip 3 points 17 hours ago

Ah man I was hoping she would leave in January with Marge.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 hours ago

Great, now she can go work as a lot lizard in Barstow for a few years to regain her self-respect.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 hours ago

HOW can this Happen? She KISSED the Chocolate Starfish!