The delay means the White House is in apparent conflict with a law
That's the thing. "Apparent" is actually too strong of a word here, because they aren't in conflict with the law at all. Unenforced laws are meaningless laws.
this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
496 points (99.6% liked)
News
33670 readers
2502 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The DOJ is now led by people who are 100% all-in on the orangeboi cult, so there’s going to be 0 consequences whatsoever
What the fuck is even the point of having a deadline when there are zero consequences when they blow past it?
While the republican controlled congress might not care if dems ever retake both chambers it will be added to the list of crimes for impeachment.
Lots of ifs, but in a sane world this would have been enough at one time
Not unless the Democrats flush half their own leadership because NONE of the DNC leaders have any interest in actually doing anything about Trump.
They did impeach him last time and I believe all the senate dems voted to remove him from office. Still shy of the 2/3rds majority
So if anything it's the Republicans not doing anything.
But you are right, the resistance to Trump has been ineffective and they keep rubber stamping his appointments. So my hopes are low, but we can only know if they get a majority.
I despise "both sides" bullshit, but they were definitely correct in this case.
Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries have completely abdicated their responsibility as the main check on the Executive branch. They need to go.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
What's the point of impeachment? Wasn't trump already impeached a couple of times in the first term? He didn't get kicked out or banned from running again
Impeachment is necessary to kick him out. That's the point. Yes it takes votes, but you have to Impeach first then the Senate can vote to remove.
Being impeached has no effect on eligibility to run again.
That's the legal framework
load more comments
(5 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
✨ create consequences ✨
I know it's a big word and people hesitate to use it, but it's not debatable anymore.
These are traitors.
Traitors are operating our federal government.
And they aren't just going to leave when asked politely.
load more comments
(9 replies)
Surprise, surprise...
Is it time yet?
Ah.. guillotine-Chan.. we need your powers more than ever..
load more comments
(1 replies)
If they aren't made to follow the rules, then they don't need to follow the rules, and then the rules are optional, enforced only when it empowers them.
They need thousands of FBI agents more to obscure Orange's name?
How many FBI agents know how to use sed?
's/Donald Trump/Bill Clinton/g'
They even have the same number of characters
"Bill Clinton went down on Bill Clinton" doesn't have the same ring to it.
load more comments
(2 replies)
And nothing will happen.
That's not true. Schmuck Schumer might issue a stern letter.
Not too stern. Don’t wanna hurt anyone’s feelings.
It's important to remain polite at all times. We wouldn't want to offend traitors/ kleptocrats/ racists/ pedophiles/ psychopaths.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Stop calling Epstein a "late financier". They were a "child sex trafficker".
load more comments
(1 replies)
Who's gonna hold them accountable? Democrats? SCROTUS?
Anyone who was thinking Trump wasn’t just going to shred or redact anything that implicated him was dreaming.
It’s a little weird that they’d delay…so much. I don’t understand and can’t sufficiently explain why they’re doing it. My best guess is they want to start a war before they release some of the stuff that makes him look bad by proxy. I guess maybe some of the people he’s throwing under the bus need a heads up?
potentially just wanted to be president so he could be in charge of these docs
load more comments
(3 replies)
If they were at all interested in transparency, they could/would/should have been releasing files as they were ready every one of the last 30 days. No reason to wait until the last minute to dump all of them at once other than slow walking the inevitable.
They can do that? Why the fuck can they just ignore their own deadlines???
Because no one will hold them accountable.
I am Jack's complete lack of surprise
I'm confused why would they miss a deadline. Is their hard drive copying slow? Or have they not finished altering the files to suit?
So, who's going to prison for this? Party of law and order, right?
ok so go arrest Bondi like you said you were gonna but you actually won't.
Heaven forbid a Democrat actually does what they say they're going to do.
Which Democrats have the authority to arrest her?
Which one said they would?
Shh. You're stepping on the non-American throwing out ragebait in US news and politics with your pesky follow-up questions.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
To the surprise of absolutely no one.
Why are we still calling Epstein a financier?
Oh that's fine. Bondi can be released from custody when the files are.
Fuck this administration.
You don't say.
OfCourse not
Ran out of black markers I'd guess.
view more: next ›