this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
363 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

77090 readers
3176 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/55094518

“The UK government wants technology companies to block explicit images on phones and computers by default to protect children, with adults having to verify their age to create and access such content,” the FT report said. “Ministers want the likes of Apple and Google to incorporate nudity-detection algorithms into their device operating systems to prevent users taking photos or sharing images of genitalia unless they are verified as adults.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 141 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

OMG. These plans are getting on my nerves.

When a parent gives a kid their device and sets the child’s birthday, then enable these. If the birthday is over 18, the let them do what they want.

Let parents parent the kid and get the government out of my life.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 60 points 16 hours ago (6 children)

Or just don’t fucking age gate shit.

Seriously who the fuck cares if a kid sees a titty?

[–] Mondez@lemdro.id 43 points 16 hours ago

Worse is that it likely won't be able to distinguish between intentionally titilating material and material intended to educate. Only over 18 are allowed to learn about human physiology after submitting identifying information.

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 15 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I've been watching porn since I was 10.

That's all. Porn is great.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sleen@lemmy.zip 7 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

There already should be a distinction between what is a child and what is a teen - there is a huge difference and these laws don't take that into consideration. The only thing these laws do is remain as an ageist weapon that create discrimination.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 11 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Children generally aren't that interested in nudity and most don't understand porn, just that it's something shocking

[–] sleen@lemmy.zip 14 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

That is true, the problem with nudity isn't with age anymore - it's with the perceived notion that nudity is damaging in some mysterious way.

Some countries are allowed to have nudity on tv which brings this indoctrinated viewpoint to perspective. In fact, this is viewed as normal no matter the age in such countries. In addition, sex-ed for older children and teenagers is of higher quality compared to western countries which prohibit nudity.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (4 children)

worst thing for sexuality the UK ever did was let the protestants flee to the US instead of executing them (which they had no trouble doing with so many other "undesirables"), now their braindead dogma is spreading back across the pond

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MudMan@fedia.io 24 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

It's kind of unfortunate how much this has been encourage by petty online fights. People were very excited when "will somebody think of the children" was applied to, say, some social media content or gaming loot boxes because the Internet did not like those things, so they were very happy to ignore the pre-existing parental control devices and request blanket bans. Then people remembered that a bunch of old, prudish people on both sides of the political aisle don't like porn and it was too late.

Man, people love the "they first came for" argument online and I should have guessed the first time it really pays off in the 21st century it'd include the absolute most depressing things possible instead.

Anyway, this is bad and I don't like it, but UK politics are almost as bad as US politics, so I'm happy to let both stew in their own cautionary tale juices.

[–] evilcultist@sh.itjust.works 9 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

None of those other things should require any sort of identity or age verification, though. In the case of loot boxes, government should be able to tell companies, “hey, you can’t sell that here”. In the case of age verification and nudity scanning there’s a whole host of issues from the fact that people don’t find loot boxes to be taboo or embarrassing to the fact that people do find nudity and porn embarrassing, to the fact that any scanning systems will false flag, to questions about who has access to the data that is submitted and how long it is stored, to how easy it could be to misuse the systems to go after disadvantaged groups (we all know LGBT content will intentionally be covered by this, whether they’re open about it or not, right?), to whether or not the system will be used for other purposes that either aren’t being said aloud or won’t be realized until after it’s implemented.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 100 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Puritanical bullshit... what the fuck.

*It's like tumblr banning nudity, which basically came down to banning any picture containing nipples. Except like, for a whole backwards country.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 77 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

UK war on ...nudity?

Them being prude is nothing new but this takes the cake.

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 26 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It's not about nudity. It's about control. The government wants full control over your computer and mobile phones.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 16 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Home of the [in]famous page 3 Girls

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Infernal_pizza@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 18 hours ago

Jesus fucking Christ I hate this shithole of a country

[–] habitualcynic@lemmy.world 50 points 8 hours ago (7 children)

Even if you’re morally opposed to the various things this addresses, it is so immensely concerning and unwise to want a corporation to have this much control over your actions, daily life, and liberty.

I don’t think enough people talk about that.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 47 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

Ahhhhhh just fuck off you useless cunts! Why don't you fix the fact that we've got kids fucking starving in this country before worrying about if they've seen tits before they're 18?!

It's dumb shit like this that is really pushing me to KMS once my mother has passed on. I can't stand sharing oxygen with these morons.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 26 points 14 hours ago (9 children)

Never KYS for something that's somebody else's fault.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 47 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Gotta love how it's "better" in these assholes' "minds" to pretend sex doesn't exist than to actually parent them on the topic that the kids are gonna find out about anyway - often in an unexpected and/or uncontrolled fashion. I'd much rather get ahead of that and make sure they know what they need to before they come face-to-face with it and are clueless - something much more likely to result in what is a supposedly (because they sure are picking the worst way to avoid it) undesirable outcome in the end.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 22 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It's about surveillance. The nudity is a made-up reason.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 9 points 14 hours ago

I know this, but the general populace eats this shit up. They either refuse to believe that, or "think" it's somehow worthwhile to "protect the children" (because they sure AF can't be bothered to parent properly).

[–] deleted@lemmy.world 47 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

We need a solid linux phone fast.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Saw posts about one on Lemmy today, seems to be pretty cheap too

[–] raviiishing@sh.itjust.works 10 points 15 hours ago (2 children)
[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 16 points 15 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 41 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Bringing back the prudish Victorian era?

[–] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 17 points 11 hours ago

I could actually imagine Starmer flustered by the sight of an ankle.

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 38 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

What a joke world we are living in. UK is getting too crazy with their "protection children" and introducing age limits by people providing their password and IDs. And chat control. And now this again, blocking these pictures would require massive privacy issues and closed source operating systems that will lock the user down like North Korea.

[–] Sp00kyB00k@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

Meanwhile their prince Andrew was 'protecting' the children right

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 38 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

that will quickly turn into "continuously monitor your users' screens for what they are doing so you can detect nudity" where the real aim will ofcourse be surveillance and selling highly personal data. I don't know about Apple but google will be all over it.

[–] kalpol@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 hours ago

Apple just has better image control

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 38 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Soon: Police sirens have been detected, video recording terminated.

police begin shooting protesters

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 29 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 12 hours ago

Seems more reasonable to put UK-blocking systems on them...

[–] Takashiro@lemmy.today 26 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

In the end it isn't about the kids , what they want is control and tracking of everyone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 25 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Kier Starmer is a nevernude. Pass it on.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] toebert@piefed.social 16 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

They're doing their part in UK politics. Tories stole everything they could and drove it all into the ground until everyone got sick and elected labour. Now they're raising taxes to put money back in and doing everything they can to make sure they're hated enough that there is no chance they get re-elected. Then, Tories can just walk back in and take all the money coming in from the new taxes again. It's a beautiful cycle of the general population getting fucked from both sides.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] acme401@lemmy.world 15 points 5 hours ago

Gargle my balls, m'lord.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 14 points 10 hours ago

100 members of the lords vs one adguard filter

[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago

Fuck you. My phone. My rules. Open source OS it is for my next phone...

[–] treesquid@lemmy.world 11 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

England is turning into a really proper shithole country

[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 hours ago

Why, yes I would like to get literally cockblocked by Google and Apple. Thanks UK! /s

[–] specialseaweed@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 hour ago

As the dad of a teenager, I am "encouraging" him to put nudity blocking systems on his phone.

oh shit would you look at that i just taught him how to go around me and hide his behavior better im sure there will be no future consequences whatsoever

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 hours ago

Year of the linux phone

If they make it obligatory, sudo systemctl disable uk-spyware

(I know that in that case it would be illegal to disable, solvable with sudo systemctl enable uk-spyware-spoof)

load more comments
view more: next ›