this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2025
805 points (98.1% liked)

People Twitter

8738 readers
2233 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 279 points 2 days ago (31 children)

Wait... that doesn't look like the war thunder forums...

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 76 points 1 day ago

jokes on her, the intel she’s digging for i leaked on war thunder already

load more comments (30 replies)
[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 149 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The actual last thing you see before leaking state secrets...

collapsed inline media

[–] JohnAnthony@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 day ago

"lul not like you losers have any actual clearance"

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 107 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I already leaked. She just doesn't know.

[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 85 points 1 day ago (2 children)

that actually happened to one of my acquaintances a couple of years ago. hooked up with some girl at drone convention and she got arrested shortly afterwards for spying. he saw none of it - just got informed later on that he was about to get the honeypot treatment due to his work. dude was so scared he went ballistic on his digital footprint and won't even talk to you if there's any mic'ed device in his vicinity. if i ever saw a man "scared shitless" that was it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 69 points 2 days ago (4 children)

The irony being all the Defense contractors on here that upvoted, saying "heh, boobs do be like that," and there's some website that tracks who votes how on Lemmy, thus revealing a short list of maybes.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Oh no, I made a terrible mistake and upvoted the post multiple times. Now they'll definitely go after me :(

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] assembly@lemmy.world 62 points 2 days ago

She can have them.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 52 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Lies. Last thing you see is a WarThunder forum comment claiming that the radar cross section of a F-22 is about the size of a golfball, and you know for a fact that in most directions, it has a radar cross section comparable with a bumble bee.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago

If she thinks I'm not atleast seeing the tiddies before I commit treason she has another thing coming.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Had a Russian woman way too into me at the bar during RSA. Maybe I was being paranoid but I bailed.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The worst part is when they're girl-next-door natural beauties like this.

Your brain can say no to an obvious escort/Victoria secret model suspect, but when your animal brain starts shutting down your frontal lobe with "Oh my god, she's the one!!" malware you're screwed lmao

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jaschen306@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 day ago

That's weird. That doesn't look like a Signal chat.

[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 32 points 2 days ago

Sexretary of War

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)
[–] yopyop@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So this means I can safely date her ? I'm relieved, thanks !

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

I'm in the wrong industry.

"SecWarCrimes has invited you to a Signal chat"

[–] _Nico198X_@europe.pub 29 points 1 day ago (4 children)

what's to stop one from benefiting from the honey pot, but feeding them false information?

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I used to work for a large defense contractor as a consultant. The best way to damage China would have been to let the spies see everything and hope they implemented the same fucked-up shit over there.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Describe the technical specifics of your job in a way that misleads them as to the actual information you're working with, but that won't be immediately obvious to an expert that's potentially even more familiar with the source material you're working with than you are.

It's just hard to keep that kind of lie going - it's not impossible, but fooling someone with an entire intelligence agency requires a whole lot of both luck and planning.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

apparently counterintel is really hard to do, according to some other lemmy comment i read before somewhere.

[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

it is case-dependent. not every honeypot operation is about gaining intelligence. some are just to discredit someone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Jokes on her, most of my country's military resources haven't been updated since the Boer War.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Technically I can only break ITAR but they know everything I know already, so fuck it we ball.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Context? And also, would. Totally would. 😍

[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (4 children)

the original honey pot. basically, an attractive person from a geopolitical foe country feigns interest in you (sometimes involves sex) and gets you to divulge secrets that they then pass on to their handlers.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 19 points 1 day ago

this has been the most effective espionage since forever

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sparkles@piefed.zip 17 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It must be difficult dating with that kind of job.

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I know someone who has a security clearance of some type, I got interviewed about them a few years back. In a rounabout way they said that people who cant talk about work tend to date other people who cant talk about work. Not necessarily in the same field but people who are used to compartmentalising like doctors, lawyers, etc. People who professionally understand "I cant talk about it".

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And then the twelve colonies are destroyed in a surprise attack.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›