this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2025
244 points (99.2% liked)

politics

26681 readers
1647 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Texas politician has come under scrutiny for filing as a Republican after raising money from Democrats.

Katherine Culbert, a former Democratic nominee for the Texas Railroad Commission, has launched a 2026 campaign under the Republican banner, raising questions about candidate transparency and campaign fundraising practices.

It is understood that she used the Democratic fundraising platform ActBlue to raise money for her campaign. The ActBlue team said it became aware late on Tuesday afternoon that Culbert had switched parties.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] watson@lemmy.world 63 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Forever cementing the fact that Republicans are fraudsters and liars.

All of them. Prove me wrong.

[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 40 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Well yeah, that's why she picked republican.

[–] HootinNHollerin@piefed.social 33 points 3 days ago

What a fucking cunt

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 30 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Democrat voters should re-register as Republicans and vote for Democrat.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'm not American, so excuse me if I sound dumb, but how would that mess with republicans? Like, what's even the point of registering if you can vote for whomever you like anyway?

[–] brendansimms@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The 'democratic party [DNC]' and the 'republican party [RNC]' are two private companies that have hijacked the electoral system. They (sometimes, but not always) hold 'primary' elections to choose which candidate they will run in the actual election. If you are registered with the party, then you can vote in the primary elections to choose their candidate. If, for instance, I were to register republican (me, a dirty commie) then I would vote for the primary candidate that I was most certain would lose in the actual election. Anyone can vote in the real election, so i could stay registered as republican and vote for their worst candidate in the primary, then I could go to the real election and waste my vote on a third-party socialist candidate. (I put a lot of irony in my description here, but I hope its still clear why someone would register for the opposite party). [EDIT: I have just learned that each state has a different setup for who is allowed to vote in primaries, so this scenario is not universal. Thanks to Baron Von J comment below]

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wow... I had no idea... Thanks for the write-up (and I love your irony, but your meaning came through loud and clear)!!

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's called a closed primary and fewer than half the states do it that way. Here in Texas, the primaries are open, but voting in a primary affiliates you to that party for that one calendar year so that only those who voted in the original primary can vote in any run-off elections from the primary.

[–] brendansimms@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I did not know this! I thought they were all closed primaries.

[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Primaries vary state by state, in some you have a jungle primary where you don't have to register for that party. And railroad commissioner is a bigger deal than it sounds because it has a lot of power over semi related things.

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In racist NC, you are only allowed to vote for the party you are registered to in many towns, counties, and municipalities. They DO NOT like people registering as independent, since they can vote for both parties or whoever fits their needs the best. I've been an independent for years because i don't want to be targeted by the violent GOP if they see me registered as a dem.

[–] Makhno@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I've been an independent for years because i don't want to be targeted by the violent GOP if they see me registered as a dem.

Oh they'll still get ya, worry not

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago

How many times has this happened and we're all like oh well that sucks anyways???

That is fucking fraud! You LIED AND CHEATED the public. This "administration" ofc will allow this and nothing will happen...

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Hmm, any cunning Dems wanna try the same stunt, see how it goes for them?

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

I'm actually charmed by the idea of someone running in a deep blue district with the message "You remember how much we fucking hated Joe Manchin? Well, elect me as a Republican, and I'll be the most goddamn Democratic Republican in recorded history, and they won't be able to do a goddamn thing about it."

[–] nocturne@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

As large of a violence fettish the repugs have I am sure there would be no threats of a lynching.

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 days ago

I'm thinking that the person who did this (R) will face no consequences for their out right lie, but there would be legal consequences for a dem doing the same thing. Source: lived history ;)

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Not a fan of the bait and switch, and I haven't really looked into her beyond this article so I can't say if this is the case

But I kind of wonder if this isn't actually a pretty good strategy.

A whole lot of Texans aren't going to vote for anyone who doesn't have an R next to their name, regardless of if they actually like their policies or not.

So maybe if you just do everything as a Democrat would do but register as a Republican and don't talk about it too much, you can slip one by them and get the idiots to vote for an actual RINO.

Of course the trick is getting the word out there to get Dems to vote for someone without a D next to their name as well without clueing in the Republicans that that's what's going on. The Republicans are a little more used to listening for dog whistles than Democrats are.

[–] marv99@feddit.org -2 points 3 days ago

Maybe a clever trick to be safely voted and then switch back and work for the Democrats' agenda ?