this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
15 points (58.2% liked)

Fediverse

38029 readers
306 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] realitista@lemmus.org 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

It's an interesting concept to discuss, but I don't see a problem in grafting a photo-only community over activitypub.

It beats the alternative of having Instagram remain the dominant player. I mean if you only want to see pictures, you won't sign up for a service like Mastodon that will serve you text instead.

And I don't see any need to add a default picture to every post just to get to these people. Let them see their photos if that's what they want.

It's still more users for the fediverse and I don't really see a better way to implement this. Let people enjoy themselves on the fediverse in the way they see fit.

[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 1 points 11 hours ago

The thought behind the post is worthwhile to ponder and discuss.

Personally, I don't think it's as dire as the text makes it seem. The speculation that a steadfast refusal of showing text only on PF might lead the AP protocol guardians to include a dummy pic in every post seems to me to be in the "possible but outlandish" category.

If the premise of AP was that every user should be able to see everything everywhere then defederating from certain instances shouldn't be possible. But that's a feature, not a bug.

The tree of the fediverse is big and nobody needs to saw off any branches. A picture only branch can sit next to a hypothetical text only one. I can see an argument that newbies to those particular branches could be more explicitly made aware of the filtering they will experience. While I was reading the text about the users who thought they saw everything from Mastodon on PF, my first thought was: this strains credulity. But then again, users are dumb. I hadn't realized for a while that shared posts don't show up in my PF feed on the app either.

I don't think anybody could become too big for their breeches on the fediverse because the fediverse is in no position to challenge the incumbent corporate platforms. Don't get me wrong, I love it here and on Mastodon (and on PF). But if you come from those polished centrally organized platforms and you're not willing to invest at least a little bit of time into learning how federating works (also refer to users are dumb above), you'll already be disappointed and put off before you realize you now need to also become your own algorithm. The threat scenario that PF could become so big that it can dictate protocol also presupposes that AP is the protocol that will endure forever. And with AT it already has a competitor waiting in the wings. As I said up top, the thought about how one dominating branch could damage the whole tree is worthwhile. But in a dramatic shift from this metaphor: we are in no position to have to cross this bridge any time soon.

Another reason why PF won't be getting out the chainsaw is its usability. It's only great for looking at pictures. It's terrible for having discussions about them unless you only use the website. I'm using the Android app and it's not great. Features came and went. The UI leaves a lot to be desired for me. It currently feels a bit abandoned because Dansup is more preoccupied with challenging TikTok. I still like PF because I go there just to look at pictures. I go to Mastodon for memes and dry remarks. And I don't feel like I'm breaking the protocol.

This image may be a bit wonky but convenience stores don't go out of business just because 24h supercenters exist. They both exchange ice cream for money but one of them has a bigger selection of flavors. PF is 7/11, Mastodon is Walmart.

[–] Atlas48@ttrpg.network 1 points 2 hours ago

Pixelfed doesn't provide the same service as Mastodon. It's stupid to think of them as identical services.

[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 minute ago

Oh wow, why not just show the users avatar on text only posts?

Then pretty ui and unbroken compat.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›