this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2025
181 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26561 readers
2710 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Move marks president’s latest effort to dismantle pollution regulations and support for cleaner-running vehicles

Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that he is repealing the Biden-era federal fuel economy standards, significantly weakening fuel efficiency requirements for tens of millions of new gasoline-powered cars and light trucks.

It marks the US president’s latest effort to dismantle pollution regulations and federal support for cleaner-running vehicles and renewable energy. Burning gasoline is a significant contributor to global heating and transportation is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States.

“We are officially terminating Joe Biden’s ridiculously burdensome, horrible actually, Cafe standards that imposed expensive restrictions,” Trump said in an Oval Office announcement, flanked by top auto executives including the CEOs of Ford and Stellantis. “It put tremendous upward pressure on car prices, combined with the insane electric vehicle mandate.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (31 children)

This is what you voted for protest-non-voters.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

But Genocide Joe or some shit

load more comments (30 replies)
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

National standards might change, but I’m betting California and some other states will still hold car manufacturers to a higher standard.

[–] Bristlecone@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Reasonable, but this shit still fucking pisses me off

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Just tax fuel more and let math do the work. Europeans are shifting to EVs because environment? It's because gasoline is $7.50 a gallon and they can do math.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fuel efficiency—the measurement for getting more mileage out of the same amount of gasoline. Congratulations, MAGA voters, you played yourself! When you pick up that new pile of trash made by Ford or Stellantis (and I know you will because they're AMERICAN* cars), I hope you enjoy the higher gas expenses that you voted for.

* With the extra irony being that many of those "American" brands are owned by Stellantis, which isn't even headquartered anywhere in North America.

[–] Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They already played themselves by picking the 'American' vehicles. They are all trash and hard to work on.

The Japanese ones are really the only ones built for longevity and ease of maintenance.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Shame SAAB went away. No one beat them on longevity. Volvo comes close, but even they don't have hundreds of cars with 2,000,000 miles on the odometer. SAAB hasn't made a car since 2011 and keeps adding cars to the list.

[–] Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works 2 points 18 hours ago

My buddy has a Volvo and had to spend $200 to replace one of his headlight hubs because it got rainwater in it.

They made it to where you have to hook it up to a Volvo computer because it needs proprietary software to set up with the rest of the car. None of the local mechanics would even touch it and all told us the same reason why.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 11 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

So the plan is to sell inbred rednecks thirstier trucks, while gasoline demand is decreasing and will become a niche product in a decade.

Enjoy your $300 fillups boys.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

And after buying inefficient vehicles, they'll complain loudly about the price of fuel

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

Oh I can't wait for the next non-Repulican president so they can print more dumbass stickers saying "I did that" when the price goes up.

[–] Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"I want to destroy the world quicker because think of all the shareholder value we can create along the way"

Its really fucked up man. I'm not a communist at all but I start to understand why people would want to go the complete opposite way of this system.

Its basically "I don't give a fuck how many people die or even if we destroy the entire world in the process I just want to generate more money for the people at the 'top'" and its really sad.

There's absolutely no reason to do this, other than generate more money at the expense of the citizens and the entire planet.

[–] UncleMagpie@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago

Why the fuck is the president rolling back or setting any regulation? That’s what congress is for. Also, for example, they are supposedly handling tariffs and upholding the constitution. Their duties include impeaching and removing from office presidents that violate their oaths and the constitution.

Yes I know we’re in this mess due to the combo of an evil fascist president and a weak corrupt congress. And decades of congress allowing presidential power to escalate.

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Great, another way to give oil companies more money and still ignoring the cost of living crisis we are all struggling to deal with.

Another GOP idea that will hurt us way more than it will help.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Another GOP idea that will hurt us way more than it will help.


It'll help. It'll even be pleasant for the rich donors. The filthy plebiscite deserves to eat the shit it wallows in because the rich have all the money.

-The corrupt politicians fucking us over.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I'm sure this won't be good but CAFE standards were garbage and resulted in all the giant trucks we see to day so fuck em.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

The problem is they’re not repealing the truck exceptions, they’re repealing the increased efficiency

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 6 points 22 hours ago

Trumps got to keep those angry older white guys driving lifted blacked out trucks with a sticker of a little kid peeing on something happy.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 5 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Anyone remember how EVs were totally going to take over by 2030?

[–] Killer57@lemmy.ca 5 points 17 hours ago

They still are, everywhere that isn't the US or parts of Canada

[–] HerrBeter@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

This wasn't very popular in the fossil fuel industry, they've done everything in their power to stop BEV and electricity

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

Just another horrible thing in a long line of horrible things both Trump admins have done. Wrt climate action, leaving the Paris Agreement was the big one. After that, this - perversely - feels like par for the course.

Cafe standards

Not familiar with that turn of phrase ... oh, it's another acronym: CAFE

load more comments
view more: next ›