this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2025
53 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

4695 readers
538 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kadup@lemmy.world 21 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

A subscription... for a toilet? Internet access... for a toilet? Cameras... for a toilet? Am I having a fever dream?

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 14 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Don’t forget AI, for a toilet.

[–] Deconceptualist@leminal.space 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

So our toilets will very soon be smarter than the current US president, got it.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Is it even a bar (standard) anymore of it’s low enough to be laying on the ground?

[–] Deconceptualist@leminal.space 3 points 1 hour ago

Pretty sure toilet water often goes below ground. So that's where we're at 😞

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

I mean, if that one gains sentience and goes all SkyNet on us I'll understand where it's coming from

[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, there is a legitimate benefit here. The camera can analyze your feces for health issues. And most people aren't smart enough to set up their own server so they host one for you. And the AI analysis would cost a lot more to be processed locally.

And personally, I would not be terribly concerned about photos of my poo going into a database.

Not saying you should buy one of these but it definitely can provide value, especially if you have intestinal issues.

[–] kadup@lemmy.world 14 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

My field is bioinformatics. I'm willing to bet $500 there's little to no valuable data being gathered at all, and quite a lot of noise, rather than anything relevant for your health. I'm sure, just like your smart watch, they can make it sound like some deep insights and health exploration, but I guarantee you it's not.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

You're telling me there's zero valuable information in photos of feces? What about this?

collapsed inline media

[–] kadup@lemmy.world 12 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You’re telling me there’s zero valuable information in photos of feces?

Nope. I'm saying a private company and whatever training set they have, plus a cheap RGB camera and an AI model, is not going to give you any information that you can't derive by simply looking at the feces yourself, much like the table you just linked. Though that table itself is an oversimplification that, being unable to take other parameters into account, also contains potentially misleading conclusions.

[–] artyom@piefed.social -1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

is not going to give you any information that you can't derive by simply looking at the feces yourself

Yes and you don't have to hire a plumber to fix your sink if you're a plumber.

The point is:

  1. Professional analysis
  2. (more importantly) Automated logging (no pun intended), potentially for human medical review periodically, or at a later date.
[–] kadup@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes and you don’t have to hire a plumber to fix your sink if you’re a plumber.

You are severely misunderstanding the point being made. Imagine you have a leaky pipe, you hire a professional plumber, they charge you $500 and say "yep, I can take a look and I conclude it's a leaky pipe! My job here is done, see you next time. I can also give you an AI generated list of reasons pipes often get leaky"

What I'm precisely telling you is that this company can't provide the professional analysis you just commented.

[–] artyom@piefed.social -3 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

this company can't provide the professional analysis you just commented.

And why not?

[–] SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Because there is more that goes into telling if someone is unhealthy than just looking at their stool. And the few signs that DEFINITELY point to health issues would be assessable by the average person just looking at their poop.

[–] artyom@piefed.social -1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Sure, and there's more that goes into telling if someone is unhealthy than just looking at their blood oxygen levels or heart rate or arrhythmia, but these are still valuable indicators that we already track and look for symptoms pointing to a potential issue.

Plus health is not binary, it's a spectrum, and looking at your feces can give be an indicator of where specifically your gut health lands on that spectrum.

[–] kadup@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Because it's an incredibly unreliable data point by itself, and requires significantly more than visual analysis to prevent several co-variables.

[–] artyom@piefed.social -1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Who said it had to be used by itself?

[–] kadup@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You're really willing to die on the hill of poop camera subscriptions, I'm not willing to waste time diving further into the subject. You're ignorant of the topic, which is fine, but I won't be the one explaining further.

[–] artyom@piefed.social -1 points 2 hours ago

I'm not dying on anything, I'm just having a discussion. It's what I come here to do. If you don't want to discuss it, that's fine, but the name calling is unnecessary.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago

This needs a nottheonion tag.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

Soon

"... the federal agency announced a 20 million dollar settlement with the individuals who claim the agent invaded their privacy when he accessed their toilet cameras without their consent. A source who did not wish to share their name said the department was initially given back door access as part of an undisclosed agreement with Kohler to further their investigation into 'transgender crime' and further anti-drug smuggling efforts. When contacted for a statement on the matter, the department's spokesperson stated, "Fuck off, lib.'"

[–] nunzilla@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 hours ago

No shit, Sherlock, where do you think the other end is? I would be even more concerned than I already am if the other end wasn't Kohler.

[–] stray@pawb.social 4 points 5 hours ago