this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

14941 readers
29 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

"In short, I am superior to any other species, race, or creed. And especially femoids, fuck them."

PussSlayer666, CoD Clan Leader.

[–] Wizzard@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago

But compared with human eyesight, they could still see more 'colors' - As we see (almost) the same white in incandescent bulbs as LEDs and fluorescents, they might actually see the component colors and their intensities.

Not unlike how we may hear a combination tone when multiple other tones are played, and hear the difference (or sum) of them.

[–] Geodad@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Technically, all the colors are fake. They're just the halucinations of a brain trying to understand the input from sensory organs.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That doesn't make them fake, in the same way that x can mean 2. You are merely representing a given value in a useful way.

[–] Geodad@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago

I hadn't thought about it that way.

[–] voodooattack@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But is my red the same as your red? Hmmm?

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

if two people can both point to red and agree that it's red, that's close enough. anything beyond that is just pointless esoteric debate.

[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I disagree that it's pointless. I think it may be beneficial to humanity (eventually) to establish whether or not there is an objective reality which we all experience.

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

i agree, but that's a job for neuroscience, quantum mechanics, and psychology; not a pack of dorks on the fediverse.

[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But I want to contribute to humanity in a meaningful way!

-me, a dork on the Fediverse nearly incapable of contributing to humanity in a meaninful way

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago

Working on it.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But what if the dorks on the fediverse are scientists?

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

then by all means

[–] Sedathems@mander.xyz 0 points 2 months ago

it's more in the philosophy ballpark, which shapes the interpretration of methodology and the consequences, in my humble opinion.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] voodooattack@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago
[–] Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago

Some people see numbers instead/along with colors, and different people see different numbers, so I guess the colors might be different between people too

[–] sfu@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, colors are real. And you see them.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Pink isn't real. There is no wavelength of light that is pink.

[–] bilb@lem.monster 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Its bright red, maybe toward purple! Brown is dark orange.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Light frequencies between blue and red don't exist.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Imagine how OP their colour perception would be if they did have that mental processing power

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Oh that explains this scene

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

I hate that it invalidates this episode of radiolab, which is, without a doubt, a masterpiece of podcasting:

https://youtu.be/jibvu9BHV_k?t=795

i saved the video at the 13 minute mark where they do the audio representation of the vivid colors. still worth a watch/listen

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

I don't think of it as drama so much as docucomedy.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Really wish talking about what shrimp see didn't remind me that in farming them females have one eye removed to promote breeding

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eyestalk_ablation

[–] Sedathems@mander.xyz 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I am eternally gratefull the practice is forbidden in Europe in organic cultivation. It's one of the small wins that fly under the radar. It's still a long way to people choosing for organic, awareness is the start of every change.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

So are any animals actually capable of seeing the invisible spectrums of light? Because humans technically can see them, since we make tools that allow us to. Suck on that, other animals. 😤

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Like infrared and ultraviolet? Yeah, there are animals that see those.

[–] Shou@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (7 children)

And all the other stuff we yse to see celestial objects and communicate long distance. Our phones are able to see colours we can't!

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›