this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2025
260 points (94.5% liked)

Technology

77090 readers
2833 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

TL;DR: Mozilla is killing localization on Support Mozilla, overwriting articles written by humans with machine generated translations. Although Mozilla knows that their AI doesn’t localize or adhere to style guides, Mozilla is going live with it anyway. I thank locale leaders and localizers for their tireless efforts. Locale leaders seem to be obviated by AI, and Mozilla has nothing to say about it.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tyler@programming.dev 87 points 17 hours ago (14 children)

Anytime I see an anti-mozilla article, it’s abundantly clear that it’s an astroturfing campaign to make Firefox look bad. You NEVER see these articles about chrome, brave, opera, etc which are all much much worse.

[–] KickMeElmo@sopuli.xyz 71 points 16 hours ago

Eh, I'm not about to stop using Firefox, but the complaint is valid. They nuked a bunch of work from volunteers without notice in favor of shitty auto translate.

[–] Mikina@programming.dev 43 points 13 hours ago

I'd say that's because here on Lemmy, we already don't give a fuck about and wouldn't touch Chrome or Edge with a ten foot pole, but some of us trusted Mozzila, which is now starting to do dumb AI shit. And having your trust broken hurts.

Astroturfing would not be recommending LibreWolf as an alternative.

If you look into alternatives, Brave is one that's usually mentioned but there's always someone quickly posting all of the dumb shit they did.

[–] yoasif@fedia.io 17 points 16 hours ago

Yeah, I am astroturfing. It can't be that I actually believed Mozilla when they said that localizers were heroic.

[–] BD89@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The way they are forcing AI on everyone and into every aspect of their browser especially when a large part of the people who use Firefox hates that shit is going to end Firefox.

The reason you don't hear it about all those other browsers is because people have always known they don't give a fuck what the end user wants.

Firefox used to be different. But all good things deteriorate over time. Watching it happen in real time to a browser we all use and used to love is why you see it so much posted especially in places with like minded individuals like Lemmy.

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

There’s AI in Firefox? I’m running it as new as I can in Arch and have never seen a hint of it.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Sidebar on the left has one of those star icons that opens an AI chatbot, or you can hit ctrl + alt + x

They keep mentioning AI features, but I haven't really seen anything annoying yet.

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Oh ok. I rarely use any browser features beyond bookmarks. Thats pretty much all I need from a browser. So I don’t explore the side bars and stuff.

[–] greybeard@feddit.online 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

They've also put it into the right click menu. And I think they integrated into the "click and hold link preview" feature they just added. And, annoyingly, with all this added AI, they made no provisions for locally hosted AI.

They also added AI translation in addition to their old translation system for webpages. I think the old one just used Google Translate, so the AI translation is a privacy win because it is done locally, but I may be wrong on how it used to work.

[–] hobwell@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

You actually can set up the sidebar to use a local LLM. In about:config the key is something like “browser.ml.chat.hideLocalhost”

I have it setup to use my local Ollama instance and it works great.

Unfortunately, I don’t see a way to specify an alternate external server, which would be nice.

[–] greybeard@feddit.online 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

How nice of them to have easy options for paid third party services, and hide the local options under about:config where I'd have no idea it even exists without a kind stranger letting me know.

[–] hobwell@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

Yeah, it’s not great that it isn’t visible by default. Would be nice if they had an “add/remove” option as well.

Glad you were able to get it set up!

[–] greybeard@feddit.online 3 points 5 hours ago

Thanks for the tip of checking about:config. You can specify an external server, it is also in the about:config. browser.ml.chat.provider. I'm not sure it's a feature I will ever use, but I tested it with my local Open WebUI and it seemed to work.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 15 hours ago

Almost all Microsoft KB articles are machine translated.
Every time I open a reddit article from a search it attempts to auto-translate which immediately looks and reads very inhuman.

[–] hummingbird@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago

What an odd comparison. What differentiates Mozilla from others is their close relationship with their community. Just read their manifest and you will see Immediately why they are getting flag for humiliating their own supporters.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 8 points 7 hours ago

Put it this way, I don't trust a corpo browser and never have. 2008 or whenever it was that everyone switched to Chrome, I stayed with Firefox, which I'd been using for a few years already. I remember upgrading to Firefox 2.0.

I'm interested when Firefox is pulling this shit and don't give a fuck otherwise, because I already assume the others do this.

Idk if we'll ever get anything decent out of the Servo browser engine. That would be ideal IMO. Mozilla is starting to become part of the problem.

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 10 hours ago

Calling objections to what some unelected jerks in the foundation (which is a supposedly public organization) are doing is not "anti-Mozilla". And I would first suspect of astroturfing everyone pretending it is.

Raising voices and putting pressure about things spoiling something is caring about it. And yes, people who care try to make real effect and not just safely complain to be ignored.

Mozilla honestly has been becoming worse and worse since Australis.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 hours ago

If I had to post an article here for each time Chrome did something that worked against privacy, I would just repost Ggle's changelogs. And they would not change.

If we criticise Mozilla harshly enough, there's a chance slightly higher than an snowball's chance in hell to make them change.

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 2 points 14 hours ago

But this is not about Firefox delelopment, but about community getting overthrown for apparently no reason.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 38 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

They link to it in the article, but for visibility, the resignation of Japanese SUMO community lead, contributor of 20 years. They voice their concrete issues.

[–] Hond@piefed.social 3 points 9 hours ago

that tonedeaf response of the mozilla staff boils my blood. holy fuck. i hate mozilla so much for years already but in recent times it got so much worse. cant wait to switch to ladybird or other alternatives in the future.

[–] arararagi@ani.social 24 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Why would they override articles that were already done? Makes no fucking sense!

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Try to make AI useful, of course.

Mozilla is funded mostly by Google

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

This doesn't have anything to do with Google. It's just Mozilla being overrun by hipsters.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hubobes@sh.itjust.works 12 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

Why? They have free (as in free beer) volunteers. AI could do translation for pages nobody had time to translate yet but taking over the localization seems unnecessary.

Edit: Okay it is kinda like that, the bot automatically translates everything but volunteers can still contribute and provide better localization. It just seems to not work that well, overwriting things it should not when the actual work is just translating one additional sentence. Or simply not being that great at localization. In general AI translation is not a terrible idea but this seems clearly half baked and Mozilla has stopped responding to the complaints which isn't helping either.

[–] khaleer@sopuli.xyz 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Not terrible idea? Did you heard about ai japanase localization disaster?

[–] hubobes@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I mean yes, that is why I wrote the edit. It does seem like you could do this properly, by allowing AI to do rough translations of new articles and humans do proper localization afterwards. And prevent AI from overwriting localization of text that has not actually been altered in the original language.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] __siru__@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 6 hours ago

That's not always great either though because if the AI miss-localizes things, end users in that language wont even know that their documentation is incorrect. Better to have incomplete than wrong documentation. At least then the end user will know they have to try to read a different language. It might be good to use AI to create an unpublished first draft that is then polished by a person before publishing, though it seems the AI is not good enough to be useful in that manner.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 11 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I wouldn't mind donating to have Firefox off of Mozilla's hands and back into the FOSS sphere where it belongs. Heck i'd even pay a subscription.

[–] jazzkoalapaws@ttrpg.network 7 points 9 hours ago

It's just going to line the pockets of executives.

They have the money. They choose not to spend it.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 8 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

Sooooo

Chrome is out

Firefox is put

What is a professional Brower that can do all what the above two can do, but is open source and not riddled with adware or ad allow ware, spyware and other shit?

Is there any browser left that we can still use for all sites?

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago

That depends on your understanting of "professional". Firefox has forks out here, LibreWolf for example, that removes the AI "features" and other bullshit that crept inside vanilla Firefox

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

While what happened in Japan sucks and calls for an apology by Mozilla towards the team, the general idea of machine translation on demand is one of the few working examples of machine learning. I'd recommend professional systems instead of google translate, though.

[–] yoasif@fedia.io 3 points 3 hours ago

It is going to happen to all locales, not just Japan. The Japan locale leader was just a canary in the coalmine.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

Why the fuck is lemmy so chuck full of anti Fiirefox and anti Mozilla propaganda?
I even see comments about Firefox needing to be open source again!?!?
It FUCKING IS open source, anybody can fork it if they want to, the only thing they can't do is use the Firefox logo and name.

You are all a bunch of idiots!!

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 17 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

I still use Firefox every day, but I don't trust the corporate overlords to do what's right long term. They seem to be getting greedy instead of listening to the user base. They've started including AI bullshit features for the sake of it, like grouping tabs by content that nobody asked for and that barely works for me. I'm not anti-Mozilla, but I sure am weary of it and would welcome an alternative.

I haven't come across any open source comments, but those seem pretty clueless.

[–] Sv443@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago

not for the sake of "it", for the sake of making money. they are competing with the most massive corporations with infinite money.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Is it anti Firefox progranda to literally criticize them for reopening human contributed content with lesser quality AI generated one?

Your response to that criticism is to bring up another topic (Firefox being open source) and calling everyone idiots?

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes they are, because I bet this, as always, is a complete nothing burger, just like the previous 10 times the past year I've seen similar baseless attacks on Firefox.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›