this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2025
110 points (100.0% liked)

News

33288 readers
1996 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The C.I.A. and an Afghan intelligence official said that the shooter had been part of an Afghan “partner force,” known as a Zero Unit, trained and supported by the agency in the southern province of Kandahar.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 46 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

“The Biden administration justified bringing the alleged shooter to the United States in September 2021 due to his prior work with the U.S. government, including C.I.A., as a member of a partner force in Kandahar,” the C.I.A. director, John Ratcliffe, said in a statement, adding that the accused assailant “should have never been allowed to come here.”

So the CIA trained him to become a killer but he shouldn't have been allowed to be in America?

The USA is a cesspool.

[–] watson@lemmy.world 36 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

They will say literally whatever they have to in order to shift blame from themselves to the Biden administration

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 2 hours ago

This is all because of MAGA incompetence. The Biden Administration may have let him in, but it was the Trump Administration that gave him permanent status. It was on Trump to figure out this guy's deal BEFORE they made him fully legal.

No matter how loud they scream, this is Trump's fault.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago

to the Biden administration

Which, sheesh, feels a million miles gone at this point, doesn't it?

I can't believe it's barely been a year, holy crap.

But that's always been these goons' playbook: Doesn't matter to them how long ago the "other teams'" administration was. Blame, blame, blame some more.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 8 points 8 hours ago

The CIA agents who directed him also shouldn't be allowed to enter or remain in the United States.

[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 19 points 13 hours ago
[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 16 points 14 hours ago

Always blowback isn't it.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 13 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I still find it hard to believe he would travel all the way across the country, just to shoot some random National Guardsmen at a bus stop. Dude's either got a mental illness, or he was contracted to sow chaos.

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 8 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Spent practically his entire life in a war zone, because his native country was invaded by America, and was trained to be part of a CIA death squad.

I don't think you have to reach very far to find causality here.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

"Causality" in what sense? How does his upbringing and prior training explain travelling 3/4 of the way across a continent to shoot some random people, when there are still active National Guardsmen in California? Traveling twice as far, to hit a random target simply does not make sense. Hell, there are more engaging targets in Portland right now, if he wanted to make a statement, and that's right next door.

He literally drove the whole way...which makes this equal parts impulse and days-long anticipation. This whole thing smells off, unless he's just mentally ill.

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It makes sense because of symbolism. An attack in DC is different than attack anywhere else in the country.

If his aims were political, then of course he would go there, and not Portland, or California.

None of this means he was of a sound mind, and I would say his upbringing means that he most likely not very well adjusted, how could he be?

Whether that extends to some specific diagnosis of mental illness, such as PTSD, I can't speak to.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

So, you actually think this guy is a premeditating terrorist? With a handgun?

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

You think he was contracted to sow chaos as part of a false flag operation, with a handgun?

Also, terrorist attacks are generally premeditated by design.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 hours ago

"Contracted to sow chaos", meaning to do relatively little damage, but raise local tensions. Which is exactly what a false flag operation is intended to do. It's a motivator for policy change, not an actual terror attack.

If it was genuine terrorism, he wouldn't have gone 3/4 of the way across the country, "for maximum political impact"...and then only bring a handgun. It's a complete contradiction between intent and execution.