this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
442 points (99.8% liked)

politics

22630 readers
3984 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

House Speaker Mike Johnson erupted after failing to block a bipartisan proxy voting bill allowing parental leave for lawmakers.

Despite once voting by proxy himself, Johnson called it "unconstitutional," revealing GOP resistance to family-friendly policies.

Critics say this aligns with Trump-era efforts to push women out of public life, consistent with Project 2025's goal of restoring "traditional families."

Johnson's move, including canceling House activity, exposed the contradiction in the GOP's "pro-family" stance and highlighted deeper hostility to workplace flexibility and women’s equality.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 93 points 1 day ago (6 children)

"Pro-family", "family friendly", "family values", and similar phrases are pretty much all dogwhistles for "Christian values" but not the values that actually help anyone (love thy neighbor, etc).

[–] yoshman@lemmy.world 60 points 1 day ago (2 children)

These "Christians" would already have shipped Jesus to gitmo.

Something something bootstraps.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 17 points 1 day ago

Aside from a funeral and a couple of weddings, I haven't set foot in a church since I moved out on my own. However, I would absolutely sit down for a service where the preacher read passages from the New Testament with the moral of the sermon being "Are we the baddies?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jivebunny@lemmy.world 28 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

You need the Satanic temple for these actual tenets that they supposedly stand for.

[–] entwine413@lemm.ee 12 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

That's the satanic temple. The church of Satan is a completely different thing.

[–] Jivebunny@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Yeah sorry, corrected it just around when you posted.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So not really Christian values.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, they are 100% Christian values though they're not Christ's values.

I like this Jesus fellow, but his fan club is the worst.

Paraphrased, and can't recall who said it (I thought it was George Carlin but can't find the quote).

[–] TeoTwawki@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (4 children)

There is a quote that often makes it around the internet mis attributed to Ghandi says something along those lines. The most likely origin is speculated to be Indian philosopher Bara Dada in the mid-1920s : "Jesus is ideal and wonderful, but you Christians, you are not like him."

[–] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Okay, so this was interesting to me, since Bara Dada isn't really a name. It literally means elder brother in Bengali. (Although most speakers will shorten it to Borda in everyday conversation.) I did a bit of searching, and the quote seems to come from Dwijendranath Tagore, the eldest brother of the Nobel laureate Rabindranath Tagore. Rabindranath did refer to Dwijendranath as Bara Dada (Boro Dada would be the better pronunciation) in his writings, and Dwijendranath was a philosopher and poet so it makes sense. The original quote seems to be, "Jesus is ideal and wonderful, but you Christians -- you are not like him." which is found in the book The Christ of the Indian Road by E. Stanley Jones.

[–] TeoTwawki@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

neat, I learn new things today

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KnowledgeableNip@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're dog whistles for needing more babies to keep the pyramid scheme that is our economy afloat.

Subjugating women, hating the gays, blocking birth control; it's all to pop out more babies.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (3 children)

They're never gonna restore "traditional" families if they never support a family being able to actually survive on a single income.

[–] MrVilliam@lemm.ee 15 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (4 children)

This. I would love it if my wife had the option to stay home. We're luckier than most, so she probably could, but our budget would be uncomfortably tight if she did. And actually, if she made as much as I do, it'd probably be me staying home and doing the cooking and cleaning and errands. I love that shit and hate work, and the excessive hours I work keep me from helping around the house as much as I would like.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 15 points 23 hours ago (5 children)

The kind of people we're talking about wouldn't let you stay home with the kids.

They expect men to be killing themselves in un-safety-regulated jobs for the sake of increasing the wealth of the billionaires while all women stay home playing Suzy Homemaker and popping out white babies.

That's their vision.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

That's how you can tell they lying about their goals.

[–] parody@lemmings.world 3 points 19 hours ago

survive on a single income.

“PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY”!

Boom, they’ve invalidated the argument. Trickle down & FSD coming at end of year.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 25 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

"Family Values" has always been code for "Women are Cattle"

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I was referencing the parts of the bible that cover animal husbandry and include how to manage women in the same section as the farm animals.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

They're both basically the same word.

[–] UnexpectedBehavior@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Serious question: They want all immigrants deported, illegal or not doesn't seems to matter any more. Those "aliens" do the work that the white nobility wouldn't do in the first place. Then they sent women back into the kitchen which will easily cut another 30% of the work force, probably much more. And then the tariffs are supposed to bring back manufacturing jobs (that said white nobility doesn't want to do in the first place). How do they think this is gonna work? cut the majority of your workforce and increase the demand of labor all while preventing higher salaries.

[–] running_ragged@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

Prison labour

[–] jupyter_rain@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Easy, just bring back the 60 hour workweek or child labor.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 5 points 22 hours ago

They're already working on child labor in some states.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago

Slave labor.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 16 points 22 hours ago

If women are supposed to be in the kitchen, why are most short order cooks men? Checkmate...

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 16 points 17 hours ago

"Anything that doesn't serve my fascist agenda is unconstitutional."

[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 13 points 15 hours ago

Republican leaders are people who would watch The Handmaid's Tale and think they're supposed to agree with the villains

[–] LarryLurkman@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago

He couldn't handle a strong woman.

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

When they say pro-family it seems like they mean pro-huaband and maybe pro-kids

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

pro kids until they are born then they can fuck off and die

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (4 children)

Is this the guy that's on Grindr?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 7 points 1 day ago

I know where Mike Johnson's wife can find some recipes.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 7 points 21 hours ago

Yeah

"Restoring traditional families"

That probably means they expect me to go to church, negotiate with the businessmans daughter with a dowry, and control the rest of her life while maintaining she shows that she is happy because I technically would feel awful the entire time.

I'm blissfully ignoring what they want as that "traditional" age to marry on purpose. That just makes my stomach churn knowing these freaks

[–] habitualcynic@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago

Restoring traditional families

Always means women can’t think or speak, and black people work their fields in chains

[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago (6 children)

Cool, so that means you should also have one car that might last 5 years, no cellphones, computers, and back to radio shows only. You can only live and breathe your job with little to no entertainment.

Yeah, it’s great living in the past isn’t it?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

You can only live and breathe your job with little to no entertainment.

Not to diminish your point, but back then they still had (often walkable) "third places." That included social clubs -- think the freemasons, shriners, the "water buffalo lodge" from the Flintstones (since that what Millennials and younger are most likely to be familiar with), etc. They also knew their neighbors a lot better than we typically do today: most houses had substantial front porches generating ad-hoc conversions with people walking by, they more frequently had block parties, etc.

TL;DR: they got a lot of their entertainment though actual in-person human interaction.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] halfapage@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

So many years of not being honest with oneself.

[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

America has turned into a sad pathetic joke.

load more comments
view more: next ›