this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
134 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26488 readers
1618 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Two West Virginia National Guard members who deployed to the nation’s capital were shot Wednesday just blocks from the White House in a brazen act of violence that the mayor described as a targeted attack.

FBI Director Kash Patel and Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser said they were hospitalized in critical condition.

The rare shooting of National Guard members comes as the presence of the troops in the nation’s capital and other cities around the country has been a flashpoint issue for months, fueling court fights and a broader public policy debate about the Trump administration’s use of the military to combat what officials cast as an out-of-control crime problem.

all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 110 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The silence on this matter means it's a Republican that is the suspect.

[–] Naradae@lemmy.world 54 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And that the suspect is in custody and not dead.

[–] DaMummy@lemmy.world 51 points 2 days ago
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Can't wait to see what vaguely antifascist message is scribbled on the bullet casings.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 34 points 1 day ago

They initially said the Charlie Kirk shooter was trans because TRN was imprinted on the bullets. Until someone pointed out that TRN was actually the bullet manufacturer .... headdesk

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 6 points 1 day ago

Trump Bad Ponies! Thanks Obama

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Immigrant from Afghanistan, unfortunately 😬

MAGAts are gonna have a heyday with that one

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 43 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The sad part of it is that Trump will use this to further clamp down on dissent, regardless of who and why.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Of course. He was counting on something like that happening

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He was going to anyways regardless if anyone does anything. It's why the whole "Peacefully protest so he doesn't have an excuse" is so misguided. He doesn't need an excuse.

[–] sepi@piefed.social 14 points 1 day ago

Trump has the mentality of a rapist: he's gonna force himself on you regardless of what you think, do or want. The whole "avoid provoking him" thing is victim-blaming.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 40 points 1 day ago

Last week, a federal judge ordered an end to the deployment but also put her order on hold for 21 days to allow the Trump administration time to either remove the troops or appeal the decision.

Perhaps if these judges would make the intermediary status the historically normal one instead of the fascist dictator one, this kind of thing could be avoided.

[–] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 30 points 1 day ago

Right after Trump got ordered to remove the troops and ostensibly agreed to do so. Seems suspicious.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

“God bless our Great National Guard, and all of our Military and Law Enforcement. These are truly Great People,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “I, as President of the United States, and everyone associated with the Office of the Presidency, am with you!”

What a disgusting piece of shit demented rapist.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Well that’s definitely part of it, but he’s using his office to divide people. People “not associated with the Office of the President” don’t like them at all according to his piggy face.

It’s about twelve different kinds of wrong.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 10 points 1 day ago

Also: "The animal that shot the two National Guardsmen ... is also severely wounded, but regardless, will pay a very steep price". Lol until they discover he's a white Republican, then he'll just mysteriously disappear from public discourse, just like the trump assassin and the Charlie Kirk shooter ....

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So lemme guess, it was a weird ass Republican who did this, yet it's going to cause Preznit Piggy to lash out at democrats for it, forcing more national guards to blue cities (including DC)? They'll use this to try and further their narrative.

[–] jimerson@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I''d bet an entire stick of RAM on it.

[–] Dhar@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago

A stick of RAM? I fold.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Afghan national

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/suspect-dc-national-guard-shooting-afghan-national-what-we-know/

"More than 8,000 people from Afghanistan were also granted deportation relief under a separate program called temporary protected status, which Biden extended in 2023 but Mr. Trump chose to end earlier this year."

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Conservatives before (and after) it's inevitably revealed that the shooter is a right wing nutjob:

collapsed inline media

[–] Tronn4@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

But Hamas... we mean gay liberals /s

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Last week, about 160 of them volunteered to extend their deployment until the end of the year while the others returned to West Virginia just over a week ago.

Interesting...

[–] delgato@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago

160 soldiers made an excuse to not see family over the holidays, I get that feeling

[–] mriormro@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

What were they wearing?

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

When the people who signed up to get shot at get shot at

[–] i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 day ago (4 children)

People don't join the national guard to invade somewhere and get shot at. The national guard is supposed to be protecting people at home.

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 day ago

Whoopsies! We kinda threw that out 20 years ago and never fixed it!

[–] MdRuckus@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

That’s not true. You serve both state and federal. I was in the NG. I did two tours in Iraq and a Bosnia peacekeeping mission. The NG gets deployed federally all the time.

[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Remind me, who's homes are these out of state national guardsmen protecting, because it isnt their own

[–] i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's what I'm saying. If you signed up to defend and then got assigned to invade DC, getting shot at in DC isn't what you signed up for.

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

Then maybe they shouldn't have invaded DC

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Following orders and dog-like obedience is exactly what they signed up for. Getting shot at for following orders is a risk they proudly take.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 5 points 1 day ago

Last week, about 160 of them volunteered to extend their deployment until the end of the year while the others returned to West Virginia just over a week ago.

Seems they were volunteers at this point in time.

[–] RePsyche@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Well at least we know the Nat.Guard wasn’t following any illegal orders, right?

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 4 points 1 day ago

Weird how the national guard was the target and not the people doing actual kidnappings. Like if you wanted a false flag the National Guard would be the natural choice.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

Don't go to McDonald's!

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago
[–] flandish@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

and nothing of value was lost.