this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
90 points (95.9% liked)

News

33272 readers
2316 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Paywall removed: https://archive.is/yEIp3

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I will take one for the team and take $140k a year and report back. It'll be hard, since it's only 3 times what I make now, but it's worth it for science.

[–] answersplease77@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

no please no..rethink how your family will survive the test of this strategist's poverty line.

where are the application papers? im signing up too we're in this together

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 35 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Green tested out his $140,000 theory, by looking at national average data on key costs — and calculated $32,773 for childcare, $23,267 for housing, $14,717 for food, $14,828 for transportation, $10,567 for healthcare and $21,857 for what he said were other essentials. Add in federal, state and FICA taxes, and it gets to a gross income of $136,500.

It makes sense, although people are still dumb enough to fall for means testing and declare the arbitrary line should be lower because they don't understand COLA

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 15 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

That first number is why birthrates are at historic lows. Plus kids make up part of all the rest of the numbers.

Kids are far too expensive at this point.

It's not ideal.

[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 9 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Who needs kids anyway? I can’t understand why some people want lots of kids, each and everyone of them is a significant long-term effort and responsibility.

Be child free and you could buy a brand new car every year with this poverty line.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The problem is that somebody has to have kids, otherwise we have no more humanity.

If individuals decide they would rather be child free for their own reasons, that's fine. But if capitalism makes everything so expensive that people who want kids can't afford to raise them and never have them in the first place, that is an extinction-level problem

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Not just no humanity, but also it collapses almost every system we have economically. If people stop having kids, there won't be anyone to take care of the tasks required to support the aging population.

[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 1 points 7 hours ago

I see it as a future Dubai, where foreigners with little rights make the whole of the workforce, and are the ones having the kids needed to prop the nation.

It’s a shitty future, but hopefully those migrant families are valued and treated better by democratic countries that the opulent Middle East does.

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 21 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Makes sense. About a decade ago it was estimated around 80k. With the post-covid world the way it is I think that increase is reasonable

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

87.5k in SJ, california. 100k is low income there now. now theres like a reverse white flight going in bay area now. the soccer mom karens have returned. signs of gentrification is the increasing amount of CAFES in the area.