this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
546 points (97.1% liked)

World News

50943 readers
1726 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Italy’s parliament on Tuesday approved a law that introduces femicide into the country’s criminal law and punishes it with life in prison.

The vote coincided with the international day for the elimination of violence against women, a day designated by the U.N. General Assembly.

The law won bipartisan support from the center-right majority and the center-left opposition in the final vote in the Lower Chamber, passing with 237 votes in favor.

The law, backed by the conservative government of Premier Giorgia Meloni, comes in response to a series of killings and other violence targeting women in Italy. It includes stronger measures against gender-based crimes including stalking and revenge porn.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gbzm@piefed.social 207 points 1 day ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (29 children)

People here seem weirdly confused about the term "feminicide": it means homicide motivated by misogyny. It's a subset of hate crimes.

They exist in all western societies I'm aware of, if you're confused it's probably only because you're unused to thinking of women as a protected class and hate for women as aggravating circumstances, the way hate for any race of religion is in most legal systems.

Yes they're 50% of the population, but also yes they're disproportionately the targets of violence because misogyny exists. Yet they are rarely treated as such in many legal systems.

[–] Drekaridill@lemmy.wtf 79 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Genuinely thought it just meant killing a woman and was confused

[–] daizelkrns@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It does get misused in that exact way sometimes. I'm from Mexico, these cases have been making big headlines here for a while now, some prosecutors are misclassifying cases as femicide to grab attention to their political careers.

Local one a couple of years ago where a dude ran over a woman. Local prosecutor was pushing for femicide, fortunately it was moved to manslaughter as it should have been from the start. Not everything constitutes a hate crime and cases like that (in my opinion at least) would make the distinction meaningless

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 41 points 1 day ago (48 children)

It seems weird to consider half the people as "protected class". But only one gender. Dunno why they didn't just make hate crime the charge and make misogyny fall under that

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

They're a protected class because they're singled out for violence because of their class. And it's a real world problem not a logic quiz. Misogyny and misandry are not equivalent in reality the way they are in the dictionary.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (33 children)

Does that make hate crime murder against men less worth prosecuting as such? Why shouldn't the legal definition be symmetrical?

load more comments (33 replies)
[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (15 children)

If someone murdered a male due to their sex, would you treat that any differently than someone murdering a female due to their sex?

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would assume the thinking is centered around wanting to draw specific attention to the issue. And to more clearly cite it as a unique thing for awareness purposes.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This. The goal is to send a message. Over half the women killed were murdered by intimate partners. Such a crime would already be punished by life imprisonment for Aggravated Homicide.

However femicide also includes refusal for emotional relationship, or resistance to limiting her freedom as motivators, as admissible motives for femicide.

https://eige.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/20211564_mh0421097enn_pdf_0.pdf

load more comments (46 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)
[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

"Let's slap a bandaid instead of fixing the underlying societal problems causing this and score some popularity points" - every politician ever.

Edit: okay maybe there are a few smart politicians, but they're not scoring the popularity points with this:

“Italy is one of only seven countries in Europe where sex and relationship education is not yet compulsory in schools, and we are calling for it to be compulsory in all school cycles,” said the head of Italy’s Democratic Party, Elly Schlein. “Repression is not enough without prevention, which can only start in schools.”

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (4 children)

A lot of people in here seem upset for some reason.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago

It's actually pretty sad. Kinda scary to.

[–] ButteryMonkey@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago

Pretty sure threads like this are why there aren’t more women on Lemmy..

[–] Tujio@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Fucking hell some of these comments read as redpill bullshit.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (17 children)

Does this imply that previously killing women wasn't criminal in Italy?

I presume that femicide is a subset of "homicide", but I can't tell if it means "any killing of a woman", "any killing of a woman by a man", "any killing of a woman because she's a woman", or "any killing of a woman by a man because she's a woman".

And I shudder to imagine how trans-women and trans-men fit into this weirdly sexist label.

(In America we have nice gender-neutral crimes, with enhancers if it was done out of prejudicial hate.)

[–] gbzm@piefed.social 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It means the murder of a woman motivated by misogyny. It is a subset of homicide and also a subset of hate crimes. It can be thought of as recognizing misogyny as a motive of hate and thus an aggravating circumstance to a homicide, and women as a protected class. Killing a trans woman or a trans man could very well get a "transphobia" label for a double hate crime, depending on the motives that get established. This is not as complicated as you seem to believe.

[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (15 children)

It's not complicated, it's just sexist and not explained in the linked article.

If a man kills a woman out of hatred for women that's a terrible crime and should be severely punished. But if a woman kills a man out of hatred for men, that is exactly as horrific a crime and should be punished no less severely.

Sexism in law benefits nobody.

[–] erin@piefed.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 day ago (8 children)

It isn't sexism in law. Laws are written in blood. If women are frequently being killed because they refused sex or a relationship, then a law should exist as a deterrent. It isn't just "killing a woman because they hate women," it's specifically in cases where women are stalked, harassed, or pursued non-consensually for sex or a relationship. If women were targeting men in the same way, a law should exist in that case as well. That isn't the case, though. Women are VASTLY disproportionately killed by men for reasons pertaining to sex and relationships compared to the other way around.

Italy sees a problem: women are being frequently killed by intimate partners, stalkers, and harassers specifically because of their gender. They made a law to deter that. If the opposite problem presents itself they should do the same.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 16 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] El_guapazo@lemmy.world 13 points 13 hours ago (8 children)

There needs to be more accountability for law enforcement for this too have any real effect. Studies show up to 40% of law enforcement self identify as domestic abusers. So why would they investigate themselves?

load more comments (8 replies)

♡ step in the right direction ♡

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 13 points 15 hours ago (14 children)

Yea… I’m with the incels that don’t really understand the point. If murder was already a crime that would be punished by life in prison, narrowing the specificity of who was murdered doesn’t change much of anything.

“Cool, if it makes you happy I guess 👍”

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 13 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

It includes stronger measures against gender-based crimes including stalking and revenge porn

Read?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Nomorereddit@lemmy.today 13 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

Since when have stronger punishments deterred crimes?

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 11 points 9 hours ago

Also isn't killing a person based on an immutable characteristic (race, sex, etc) already a hate crime? In the US if someone kills a woman or girl primarily because of their sex that is a hate crime on top of being first degree murder (which is a serious enough offense as it is).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DishonestBirb@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (10 children)

This is confusing. So killing a woman is now criminally worse than killing a man? That seems absurd.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (9 children)

"Hate crime" exists in the US with pretty much the same logic.

The law... comes in response to a series of killings and other violence targeting women in Italy.

"Targeting" being the keyword here

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago (7 children)

I don't see how the femicide part makes any sense or difference. There were already the exact same punishments for killing of anyone, so isn't this essentially copy pasting existing laws but with a specific group highlight? If that's the case, it will do absolutely nothing.

The second part is fine, though I hope it's meant for everyone and not just women. I don't know about Italy specifically, but in many European countries if you fall victim to these crimes as a man, you'll likely receive no help.

Would be great to see some more protections for everyone, as well as more serious punishments for violations against anyone. Making anything like this gender-specific will just fuel already problematic anti-other-gender sentiment.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Realspecialguy@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago (6 children)

"Femicide" so... murder? Yeah, hasnt "life" been the typical punishment for murder? (Life is usually 25years) .

Did they not already recognize murder of women should be treated like murder?

Victims of relationships violence (myself), stalking and harassment (myself), should have justice. Unfortunately, I dont hear much about the men who suffer from this type of violence.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 15 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

There is a massive imbalance in violent crimes, in that nearly half of all women murdered are murdered by a spouse, partner or boyfriend or other kind of male acquaintance.

This doesn't skew the other direction, so that's why women victims are getting special consideration and why there are special laws being made to make it easier to prosecute this kind of crime in a different or more efficient way. (Like we have "hate crime" laws that allow for special forms of prosecution.) This isn't supposed to solve all the problems, but it may help by making the consequences of a man killing his wife or girlfriend far less likely to be reduced by pleas of temporary insanity or the like or be dropped by the court for minor reasons.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›