this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2025
219 points (98.7% liked)
politics
26369 readers
2901 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
219
'Stay tuned!' Trump announces new criminal probe into Epstein ties to Bill Clinton
(www.rawstory.com)
Some democrats might care, although I feel like Clinton's power has really fallen off so who knows.
I'm sad that someone I thought was good committed heinous crimes, but if he indeed committed those crimes I want him prosecuted. I will be mad if Clinton is prosecuted and Trump isn't because that would be a double standard, they should both be in prison
load more comments
(1 replies)
I am 100% for normalizing prosecution of former presidents. I’m not sure Trump thought this one through.
He's not planning on being a former president.
I’ll take “ex” president
Well not a living one
load more comments
(1 replies)
Desperate old pedophile tries to deflect and distract attention away from his own criminal activity.
It's not just that, an email leaked where Epstein told his brother that trump gave "Bubba" a bj...
"Bubba" is one of Clinton's nicknames. But trump literally and consentingly sucking a dick will hurt him more with his base than raping kids, even if it's not attached to a Clinton.
But even more if it is a Clinton.
load more comments
(1 replies)
He thinks we won't go after someone on the same team. It's not meant to distract. It's meant to block.
We know this is much bigger than Trump. We know lots of rich people are involved. He has no idea that is the whole point.
Apparently trump gave ole bill a blowjob
I thought this was just some random silly comment. But apparently this is a thing
Yeah. I've been doomscrolling bsky far more than I should these days but had missed this. Apparently at least a few of the more reputable news/politics folk have actively been struggling with how to even approach this in a way that is sufficiently disrespectful to the rapist(s) while not being homophobic or misogynistic which... respect.
We need to spread this more.
The Epsteins buiseness model was basically "create blackmailable situations to sell to world leaders" and this is part of what Putin has on Trump. I saw another comment that basically said "a ring of pedophiles conspired with Russia to take over our country". Which is basically what happened and the people who voted for them got played, hard.
At this point it doesn't even matter if it's true or not. The internet will MAKE it true.
Lol, I can't believe this us actually plausable with the evidence that came out. See, everyone? It's not all bad in this batshit crazy timeline.
He’s trying to change the algorithms away from “trump blew Clinton”
Do your part and search Google for “trump clinton blowjob” and “Donald trump blew bill Clinton proof” etc
For extra fun, try posing the statement to Google's AI mode and watch it try to pretend this isn't in the news right now, and then make up lies to protect Trump, until it realizes it can't a suddenly kills the conversation.
It just said to me that there wasn't any conclusive proof that it happened, which is true.
"Trump blew Clinton" led to it talking about how he "blew Clinton away at the polls in 2016." Every additional layer of specifity leads to another slight diversion. Adding "Bill Clinton" caused it to recognize that this is in the news right now, but it's definitely not true because Bubba isn't Bill Clinton. Telling it that Bubba is Bill's known nickname caused it to agree that this is true, but Epstein said that "Bubba doesn't refer to Bill Clinton." (Epstein is commenting on these emails post-mortem? Maybe I missed something here.) Telling it that Epstein is a known pedophile sex trafficker with ties to these men and reason to lie caused it to admit that Epstein isn't a reliable source for this, and it tried to dismiss the validity of the emails altogether as "contextually untrustworthy." I then told it that a known pedophile discussing his practices in a believed to be private email thread is a reasonable context to consider the validity of his statements, but it was tired of me, and went "here are some more links on the subject. Any additional messages with start a new conversation." This could normal after being 5-6 messages deep with this AI; I had literally never used it before to know, but it felt weird to me.
It is weirdly defensive about the possibility that this had taken place, actively omitting details to bias weird takes.
(Epstein is commenting on these emails post-mortem? Maybe I missed something here.)
Mark Epstein, Jeffrey's brother, apparently.
To be fair, there's no way Trump could know who was on the other side of the wall in that glory hole.
Well, except for asking, and that'd just sound like "Mmpfgharbl."
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
As long as there's proof, go for it! If he's on that list, he must go, and it sets a precedent as well!
Wow, that is desperate.
Something, something projection.
It's like a five year old who accuses everyone else of doing what they are doing.
That is just republicans. Every accusation is a confession with them.
In large part because they completely lack morality/empathy but insist on their own self righteousness. So if they are doing something, the Other must be doing it too.
Yeah, let's see that discovery
He really didn’t think this through.
I hope Bill makes a plea deal incriminating everyone else
Clinton cares far more about his own reputation and legacy than his party or country. So not gonna happen.
That said, the funniest timeline ever would be
I did indeed have sexual relations with that man. Well, I tried to. He was so bad at it that I had to lay back and think of Hilary just to finish
Surely one of these old fucks must be feeling some remorse? What the f..
"Did you have sexual relations with President Trump?"
"I learned my lesson last time. No comment"
Full swing: The “Me Too” movement has now shifted to “Him, too!”
So Trump is our first closeted gay president?!!!!!
11/14/2025, the USA announces its first closeted gay president! The world rejoices! Its not that bad! C'mon, tell us more! Thr truth will set you free...and hopefully us too!
We can now ask for all our rights back and then some. If the president does it, then why shouldn't we also be able to enjoy those same freedoms?
Investigate them all.
Of all the people to go after... The Clinton's? Someone doesn't know their crime families very well...
Someone trade Putin some oil for these pics please
Trump is such a moron
Have they not seen how we treat our own party's politicians? What makes them think we're gonna suddenly rally an ex-politician?
"You think you can take me down?! I'm gonna burn your socks!"
"Eww, did you dig through my trash to find those?! Look, if you want them, you can have them, but stop threatening me with my garbage."
view more: next ›