this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2025
364 points (97.9% liked)

politics

26318 readers
3194 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It sounds like a bunch of Democrats want to cave in exchange for no concessions whatsoever. Edit: Bloomberg has more details

Current likely Democratic votes for this:

  • Shaheen - NH
  • Hassan - NH
  • King - ME
  • Fetterman - PA
  • Peters - MI
  • Durbin - IL
  • Warner - VA
  • Kaine - VA
  • Ossoff- GA
  • Warnock - GA

If you want to change things, you need to call their DC office NOW, and leave an email if you can't.

Edit 2: enough Democrats joined the Republicans to reopen the government with no real concessions.

The list:

  • Durbin
  • Hassan
  • King
  • Cortez Masto
  • Kaine
  • Shaheen
  • Rosen
  • Fetterman
  • Schumer
  • Gillibrand

There was a caucus meeting right before this, so the bulk of the Senate Democrats were likely OK with giving in, even if not willing to vote for it in public

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] youngGoku@lemmy.world 150 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Fetterman is a disgrace I flipping hate this dude

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 34 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Hes not your enemy. If you're a constituent, he is your employee. Give his office a call and let them know how you expect him to perform.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 99 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hes not your enemy. If you’re a constituent, he is your employee.

Those are not mutually exclusive. You could say the same thing about Trump, who is simultaneously the president of the US, and an enemy to the US.

I mean, do call the fucker, but he is 100% a traitor and an enemy to our country.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Does calling his office actually do anything? Doesn't that require him not to be a traitor?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 39 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So I am one of Jeanne Shaheen's constituents (and, NH being a small state, I've met her more than once)

I just sent her office a constituent note

Compromise was the adult, responsible, and ABSOLUTELY WRONG thing to do. I know your concerns are for your constituents and you are weighing delaying ACA extension versus SNAP and ATCs. That is the wrong calculus. Trump just dared you in a game of brinksmanship. You're a mother, you know that if you get into a battle of wills with a three-year-old, you damn well better win. Because caving means you are not the one in control anymore.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 128 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You mean these Dems are in cahoots with the GOP. There's no fucking reason why to back down now when the pressure is on unless their handlers are telling them to.

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

TBH I think they are weighing the pain to their constituents of losing ACA benefits, versus shutting down air travel and tens of millions of hungry families.

It's pure evil but it's MAGA

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 29 points 1 day ago

Yes, but caving will still continue the decline. There is nothing to gain unless they make a deal with something to gain.

Like ACA.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 110 points 1 day ago (22 children)

I hate the Democrats so so much. They never fight. Every time it looks like they might fight, it turns out that they’re not fighting. Their relentless cowardice is why we have trump and the fascists dismantling everything and hurting people.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 41 points 1 day ago (5 children)

"Vote for the lesser evil"

But why vote for the lesser evil if the lesser evil will vote with the greater evil anyway?

[–] Bob_Robertson_IX@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Vote in the primaries. Get involved in local politics and find out who actually wants to help people, has good ideas, and has a proven track record in their community.

Elect the good leaders in your kid's PTO to the school board. Get to know your local scout council (both boy scouts and girl scouts), elect them to your city council. Follow your school board, city and county council, see what they are doing, who is actually helping the community with good ideas, and then send them to the state house, demand they continue to fight for the people. The good ones in your state house should go to the Capitol for no more than 3 terms, then they can come back to the state house to be the local senior leaders.

The problem is, no one does that first part where they pay attention to the local stuff, demanding local change and building local leaders and helping to ensure our candidates aren't evil.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 86 points 1 day ago (4 children)

These spineless Democrats do not need to cave. The GOP can end the shutdown anytime they want.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Moderate Democrats know the filibuster is a powerful tool for stopping progressive legislation, and if Republicans nuke it to end the shutdown, they have one less excuse.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 77 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why the fuck did they start offering concessions and bargaining after they swept the state elections last week?

More evidence that moderates are not allies and are just as fearful of a leftward popular swing as the Republicans are.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chipacabras@lemmy.world 60 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I don’t understand what the calculation was here. People were hurting, but a whole lot more people are going to hurt without health insurance come next year. They got:

  • a vote on healthcare extension in December: almost certain to fail and even if succeeding, open enrollment ends 12/15. So you’d potentially be making people gamble thousands of dollars per month that this unlikely vote succeeds and effects them immediately
  • written into the law that federal employees get back pay - which is already federal law
  • reverses lay offs that occurred during the shut down - which were illegal
  • it only funds the government through January. So we’re going to be right back in this situation. And then what - we tell these poor SNAP recipients, “oh sorry, we’re going to need you to go though this whole thing again because we wanted to make sure people could fly home for thanksgiving.”

Hard to imagine a moderate winning a national primary after this. And what the hell is the republican answer for why it was so important that people not get slightly more affordable healthcare that it was worth starving people.

I hope that at the least, the re-establishment of SNAP will be quick.

[–] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (4 children)

And what the hell is the republican answer for why it was so important that people not get slightly more affordable healthcare that it was worth starving people.

Immigrants. It was always immigrants. They repeatedly blamed it on immigrants "stealing" tax payer money thru ACA even tho that's not really possible except for extreme circumstances that typically account for less than 1% of the funding for the program.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] neuromorph@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago

For those paying attention. It ended when the FAA started to ground private planes due to staffing shortages.

Those mega donors are the ones who pressured the vote. Not for the good of society. But because they started to get inconvenienced.

[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Once again pulling defeat out of the jaws of victory. All they had to do was literally nothing, but they couldn't even be trusted to do that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 55 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ynthrepic@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago

Fuck Chuck.

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

All this time, just to cave to the word of the Republicans is nasty work and on purpose. There is always a group of Dems who are Republicans best allies.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Thanks for giving the GOP what they wanted, "lesser evil" members of Congress.

And I had hope they would keep the pressure on the fascists, silly me.

I knew they were controlled opposition but this is going above and beyond the call of duty.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] pinheadednightmare@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (11 children)

Fuck our government! Fuck it all to hell. So this cave means that this extended shutdown and all of the suffering people went through, was for absolutely no reason. Our government has failed us yet again. It all needs to be burnt down.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] rustyfemboy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Absolutely fucking pathetic

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Every time I said they would buckle, I was downvoted. The Democratic party as an institute is not on our side, they use rhetoric to pacify us and prevent a full on revolution that's well overdue.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 36 points 1 day ago

As I said before, both parties wanted to cut the programs and fire federal workers because their donors wanted it. They pretend to fight over this wile actually working hand in hand to take money from the poor and funnel it to the 1%. Now that the shutdown was starting to really bite it's time to announce some "compromise". People are still fired, programs are still cut and politicians will keep pretending to disagree over this.

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“Deal”

Give the GOP everything it wants. Get nothing in return.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] derry@midwest.social 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Durbin is on his way out, parting gift to his cronies I guess

[–] mr_account@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

Yea, I'm going through and leaving messages for all of these assholes, and Durbin's office isn't even taking messages

A new list of Dems to vote out with new lefties.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My first thought was also, the democrats are pussies and caved again.

My second thought was getting that Epstein vote, coincidentally after some recent Epstein news...

A boy can dream. We'll see if they do some more funny business to block the release.

Open the gov and swear in Adelita Grijalva.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

Any deal that doesn't put everything in one bill is worthless.

Let's pretend for one moment that Republicans actually joined Democrats in passing the extension of ACA credits and any other concessions they got in the negotiations. Even if they passed the bill, Trump can just veto it. As long as he gets what he needs in a separate bill, he can veto anything else. And if there's enough support for the compromise to overturn a veto, there's enough to prevent it by passing it all as one bill.

But I'm sure Schumer will happily explain how Republicans voting against the ACA credits will be on their permanent record and how that will make this all worthwhile.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 27 points 1 day ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 day ago
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

These people are unhinged militant centrists.

It may seem paradoxical, but it is actually possible to be an extreme centrist. The hard truth of American politics is that there are no actual centrist voters. You won't find any significant number of people whose views largely lie right between the platforms of the two parties. What you have instead are voters whose views simply don't align well with the existing party coalitions. Their views may still be extremely strong. Think someone that is extremely pro-choice while also owning a dozen AR-15s. Maybe they have a home in the Libertarian Party, but they have no real home in either major party. They believe passionately on both subjects, they are anything but moderate for both their support of abortion choice and guns. But because their views don't map cleanly to one side or the other's arbitrary grab bag of chosen issues, this voter is called a centrist. But they're not really a centrist. They just have weak partisan alignment.

But people like these? They are actual militant centrists. In many way these politicians are the only true centrists in America. They have formed a worldview that concludes that the right answer to any single issue must lie right in the middle between the two sides. One side wants to raise taxes on the rich while the other wants to cut them? The obviously correct answer must be to keep the taxes steady. Trump wants to turn millions of legal immigrants into illegal immigrants and then deport them, while progressives want to deport no law-abiding person? The correct answer must be to brutalize merely a few thousand innocent people. Progressives want to protect trans rights while Republicans want to liquidate trans people in ovens? The obvious answer must be some roll back of trans civil rights.

People like Schumer, Fetterman, etc. are militant centrists. They will obsessively tack to the very middle of any issue. And this is fundamentally a purely ideological position, the same as any extremist. A militant racist is so committed to theories of racial superiority that they'll want to see racist policies enacted, even if they hurt the country, even if they hurt the racist themselves, regardless of even if white people are hurt. A militant socialist might demand state ownership of every type of business and enterprise, even if there's no market failure and private companies can run those things just fine. You would have to be a pretty extreme socialist to think that the government should be running bars for example.

This is the defining feature of extremism and militancy - a willingness to put one's own ideology above everything else. All that matters is the ideology. It is correct with a capital C. It is truth with a capital T. Any evidence against the ideology is dismissed or explained away.

These people are not moderate. They are militant centrists. Pick an issue, no matter the context or the evidence clear for all to see. They will always tack right in the middle between the two sides. They believe, in their heart of hearts, that the middle path is always the correct one. And they don't care how many people have to die to keep their cherished view of centrism preserved. They are as extreme and militant as any far-right militia member. They just follow the ideology of centrism rather than conservatism.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Even if your Democratic senator didn't vote for this, call them up and call them out for allowing the spinless democrats to once again get fucked by Republicans for nothing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] acme401@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 21 points 1 day ago

Now that it's clear that the Democrats will always surrender unconditionally...

How about the Republicans shut the government down again when the CR expires, and then demand that any Republicans running in the midterms pre-emptively be installed as the winners?

"But the Constitution won't let...", come on you know as well as I do that anything is up for grabs if Democrats caving is a given.

[–] GhostlyPixel@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

BOTH of my senators caved. Ridiculous and embarrassing.

Cortez-Masto and Rosen, for my fellow Nevadans.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Oh look it’s the pattern that’s been happening my entire fucking life.

And as usual my senator caves.

load more comments
view more: next ›