this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2025
288 points (99.7% liked)

News

33052 readers
4275 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mercano@lemmy.world 137 points 10 hours ago (11 children)

Why is he so against feeding the poor?

[–] aarch0x40@lemmy.world 80 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (4 children)

Republicans want a hopeless electorate as someone who is facing desperation more likely to compromise against their own best interests to meet short term needs

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 46 points 10 hours ago

Also authoritarians can't stand any challenge to their absolute authority.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 13 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Kinda hard to make that happen when all his actions are all public knowledge.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 15 points 10 hours ago

You'd think that...!

[–] nixienox@piefed.social 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe that's what they think but it can also lead to galvanization, which I think is what's actually happening.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 67 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

I have to credit a random Redditor from 10 years back or so that had some excellent analysis I haven't seen elsewhere or since. This Redditor's thesis was that the GOP have two core concepts:

  1. Society is zero-sum. For someone to gain something, someone else must lose something.
  2. Each person has a certain class level in society and that each person should stay in their class. If you are poor, you should stay poor. If you are rich you should stay rich. Attempting to move up into a higher level class should be restricted by any means of government possible.

Looking at these two together explain nearly every GOP initiative or position. So lets apply it to your question:

Why is he so against feeding the poor?

Applying the first concept: For the poor to be fed (gain), those that are not poor have to pay (loss). The GOP in power are largely rich, so they see the poor being able to eat through SNAP as a personal loss to the GOP.

Applying the second concept: SNAP may allow someone to spend what little other non-SNAP money they have on things that would advance them into a higher social class such as:

  • more education to be able to earn more for higher skilled work
  • more efficient transportation allowing them to access higher paying jobs either farther away or at more available hours
  • specialized tools that could be used to earn higher income

So the GOP don't want the poor to be fed because they believe the poor should be poor and stuck there forever.

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 36 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

So what you’re saying is they’re sociopathic monsters?

I can’t even tell if I’m being sarcastic. One question: what did they say about the poor also seemingly voting to remain poor?

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 23 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

That conversation didn't go that way, but I think the answer to why the poor voting would vote for the GOP is addressed by the (possibly misattribution) Ronald Write quote:

“John Steinbeck once said that socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires.” ― Ronald Wright, A Short History of Progress

[–] vateso5074@lemmy.world 23 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Identity politics also plays into it. Pass the blame on to another demographic and promise to do something about it.

collapsed inline media

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

That cartoon is just a variation on zero-sum, isn't it? The wealthy man in the middle is trying to convince the man in the helmet on the right that he must lose if the immigrant on the left is to gain.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 15 points 7 hours ago

To quote Trump: "We won with the poorly educated, I love the poorly educated".

Also that LBJ quote: “If you can convince the lowest white man he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he’ll empty his pockets for you.”

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The "logic" that anyone on SNAP is capable of paying their way up the "ladder" is complete horseshit. (though I know you phrased it as what the 1% believe, not reality in any way) Also, there is no ladder.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

The “logic” that anyone on SNAP is capable of paying their way up the “ladder” is complete horseshit.

By his own admission, the mother of JD Vance (VP) was on that era's equivalent of SNAP (Food Stamps). Her son became a US Senator and now sitting VP.

"He explained, “I was raised in a working-class family. My mother required food assistance for periods of her life. My grandmother required Social Security help to raise me. And she raised me in part because my own mother struggled with addiction for a big chunk of my early life. I went to college on the GI Bill after I enlisted in the Marine Corps and served in Iraq.”"

source

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 4 points 9 hours ago

By joining the military and using a GI Bill for state uni, scholarship to Yale.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The key word here is "paying". Nothing you provided in reply qualifies for that term. He's simply jumped from hand-out to hand-out and clearly has been looking for a way sneak out onto the upper crust the whole time.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

The key word here is “paying”. Nothing you provided in reply qualifies for that term.

I'm not following you here, please clarify. The only time I used the term "pay" was in the context of the zero sum example. I don't think that's what you're referring to. The next time "paying" is used is you saying it. So I guess I need to ask what you mean when you said "paying their way up the 'ladder'". Can you explain what you're meaning there?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

It's not GOP led, it's just Trump being a little bitch and you give him too much credit.

That would actually require Trump to be smart, which he is anything but. He is simply a cruel sick fuck who doesn't think or give any fucks about anyone but himself. If he does appear to give any fucks, it's only because in his mind it will benefit him. Literally anything he does is because he thinks it's good for him.

[–] nonfuinoncuro@lemmy.zip 32 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

how do you think he got so rich in the first place

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

He's not rich, he's so deeply underwater the Titanic is dry by comparison —not to mention he's always been fully compromised & passed around like a village bike since at least the 80s.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 26 points 9 hours ago (9 children)

Look, I too wish that were true. But he is filthy, disgusting rich. Through Crypto scams alone his family has made more money than you or I will ever have earned in our entire lives, combined, by order of magnitudes.

[–] Zugyuk@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

More than everyone that uses lemmy combined in their lifetimes.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 14 points 10 hours ago

Something to do with bootstraps idk

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 12 points 9 hours ago

Because he knows this is the only way he "wins" the shutdown.

The Democrats will eventually cave because... they know their base cares about not killing people. Right now we are all getting our lib on and relying on states to pick up the slack but people are gonna get REAL hungry REAL fast and the Democrats will have no choice but to just give up healthcare as harm mitigation.

Actually feeding people removes that pressure and just makes trump et al look even stupider for refusing "very reasonable" deals (that are actually poison pills meant to restart all of this right before the 2026 elections...).

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago

He hopes that he can direct the blame on his political enemies.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

Think of it like the US is one big concentration camp. There's no ovens yet, but there is just stopping food.

[–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

To own the libs!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 100 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I'm formally requesting that the trump administration not be given food until the shutdown is over.

[–] BC_viper@lemmy.world 14 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

I think they should all be given extra holes to enjoy more oxygen flow through thier systems.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

agrees in a way that keeps me off a watchlist

[–] BC_viper@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago

If im not on a watch list somewhere then people are not doing thier jobs. It may be a low priority list, but I definitely should be on one somewhere.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

I know an Italian plumber

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 hours ago

But why after? You have good ideas, but lack the confidence to see them through.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 20 points 6 hours ago

https://labor411.org/411-blog/40-of-snap-recipients-are-kids-trump-is-fighting-a-court-order-to-feed-them/

40% of SNAP recipients are children. I guess it's par for course that a pedophile would want to abuse kids in one way or another.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 18 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Most empires start to collapse when they can’t or refuse to feed the poor.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 hours ago

~~Bread~~ and circuses, at least the clowns are still around.

[–] JeSuisUnHombre@lemmy.zip 17 points 10 hours ago

Donald Trump fights to keep you hungry

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Wow, they really just want people to starve, huh?

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 hours ago

Yes. Republicans are the party of hate and suffering.

Are you religious? Then these "people" can be described as demons.

Not religious? These "people" can still be described as demons.

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago

We want to starve poor people and kids lol.

-- this fucking "government"

How to win the midterms 101: ask SCotUS to issue a same-day stay allowing you to starve your own constituents as leverage in a shutdown that's only happening because you won't budge on making people's health insurance more expensive. The art of the deal baby.

[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 hours ago

This is what America wanted .... to hurt the people they don't like.

Only problem is, the government they allowed to take power hates them all

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago

"Trump says Fuck You and Your Hungry Kids."

Fixed that title.

[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 8 points 7 hours ago

Spending taxpayer money to force the courts to obey his decision to starve Americans in need.

Totally patriotic!

[–] Steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 hours ago
[–] ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 hours ago

Oh he scared

load more comments
view more: next ›