this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2025
270 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26282 readers
3432 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hours before the first major elections since  Donald Trump’s win last November, Sen. Bernie Sanders offered a stern warning for Democrats about the party’s closed-door talks to end the shutdown.

Inside a tense, three-hour meeting at the Capitol on Tuesday, a fiery Sanders urged Democrats not to yield to Republicans without a real victory on health care. The Vermont independent was armed with fresh polling from a Democratic-aligned firm that showed voters would punish the party for giving up with nothing in return, according to a person familiar with his remarks.

By Wednesday morning, Sanders and his colleagues in Congress pointed to Democrats’ blow-out victories — including in Virginia, a state with thousands of furloughed federal workers — as the most powerful evidence yet they needed to keep fighting.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] _chris@lemmy.world 147 points 18 hours ago (2 children)
[–] fonix232@fedia.io 87 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Just for a moment imagine if he ran against the orange turd in 2016 instead of Hillary, and WON.

Imagine the US not being international laughing stock between 2017 and 2021. COVID being handled properly, with a newly reformed healthcare system actually taking care of people, making your country one of the first to get out of endless lockdowns and furloughs, no record breaking death numbers and so on.

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 34 points 16 hours ago

Take me to Carter's second term and the heritage foundation losing money on Reagan.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 26 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Well... Yes, but let's not forget he'd still get hamstrung by his own Congress even with Dems in power. They wouldn't even pass Biden's milquetoast agenda. Your fantasy needs to involve a populous that actually understands that Congress primaries matter, which is even more farfetched, unfortunately.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 29 points 16 hours ago

I'd like to think that Bernie winning the primaries would've actually energised the left wing of the US. Most of the apathy not just in the US, but all over the (western) world stems from the fact that the right always has a charismatic populist mouthpiece while the left keeps bringing out all the old, broken records, pushing actual trailblazers to the back.

With what support Bernie had, he could've easily moved tons more voters than Hillary could've ever dreamt of. Not just in the presidential election but all the other House and Senate and governor and state senate and mayoral votes.

But let's presume that didn't happen and Bernie is now POTUS with the same level of support as Biden had in 2020-2024, and with the same congressional setup as you guys ended up with in 2016.

The reason why Biden's milquetoast agenda didn't go anywhere was because he already did 50-60% of what the conservatives wanted, and readily negotiated the remaining 40-50% down to 10% just to get things passed. Of course that would barely move things anywhere.

Now think, if Bernie came out with an absurdly social-democrat plan/bill. 100% opposite of what Rs want. Even if THAT gets negotiated down to 10% to get past... that's still a thousand times more progress for left agenda than Biden could've ever hoped to achieve.

[–] laranis@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

Worst part about that scenario is we wouldn't know how good we had it. We couldn't have imagined this shit storm clusterfuck timeline.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 70 points 17 hours ago

I need to call my Senators tomorrow. I have one from each party. I tell the (R) how much the shutdown is hurting me and my entire extended family and tell them I want them to end the shutdown even if it means giving the Democrats everything they want. Then I call the (D) and tell them that I know they're under pressure to end the shutdown but me and my entire extended family have talked it over and we really really need them to stand firm about Medicaid money and access, ACA premiums, food stamps access, etc.

It's a fun game I've been playing every week, and I encourage y'all to join in!

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 56 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Those blow out Victories are PROOF that we NEED to Capitulate ENTIRELY to Republicans to get those Distressed MAGA Voters!

[–] EndOfLine@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

I worry more that they will think "Republicans are so hated that we can stop fighting and still win the midterms. The more Republicans get away with, the better it is for us in the next election."

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 46 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

FUCK.THAT.CAVE.SHIT.

They keep saying that "only" 10% of Americans rely on the ACA subsidies, but that extent is GOP talking points bullshit that doesn't explain how much every $1 spent on these programs do to generate MORE than the investment.

The overlap is insane for people who use SNAP, new business owners who buy from the state marketplaces to cover small numbers of employees, government workers who contract, local unions who have under 50 members, and so on.

Every $1 in SNAP benefits generate $1.50+ of GDP. Every $1 of ACA benefits generate anywhere from $3-$150 of the same.

This needs to be preserv, and these fuckers trying to take this money away to put it towards ICE need to go away.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 17 points 17 hours ago

Yes. But for every $1 they spend on ICE, they... generate.. oh no, no produce is getting picked, construction is stagnant... (Seriously if we ran similar metrics on GoP crap we could probably say we lose ADDITIONAL $s per $...)

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 16 hours ago

Who are these twelve fuckheads who are gonna fuck this all up? I want fucking names CNN! Of course they leave out the important information about which Senators need to get hammered with calls from their constituents to not give up!

[–] bluemoon@piefed.social 6 points 11 hours ago

finally a left center right dynamic forming in the youngest state on earth. threeparty system letsgooo