this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2025
115 points (92.6% liked)

Canada

10625 readers
443 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The federal and provincial governments have been underfunding universities for decades. Recently, universities were able to start recruiting foreign students to make up for the shortfall, but it looks like that money tap will be turned down. It doesn't look like there's a plan to make up for it.

At the same time, the feds want to

recruit more than 1,000 top international researchers to Canada, with the budget injecting up to $1.7-billion into a suite of recruitment measures.

That'll be tough if universities see their income crater.

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 46 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

It's funny that our college-like businesses are crutching on foreign students to stay afloat; and if they dry up a bit, people are pissed that they have to find a new way to keep education running as a for-profit business without the understanding that running as such is wrong.

Tax the rich. Run the schools. Go find a Viking nation and ask them how they managed since forever.

[–] honc@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 hours ago

I don’t understand why you would blame universities (calling them college-like businesses), when foreign students were the only option for increased revenue (to even just match inflation) that has been allowed in the last decade. Before that, only tuition increases were allowed, since government funding has been consistently decreasing.

I completely agree that funding for education should be through taxes, but (especially in Ontario), this is the funding that dried up a very long time ago.

Universities are non-profit organizations in Canada (we are not the U.S.) and have been advocating for increasing government funding first and foremost for a long time. Sure, universities have pivoted to fund by whatever the best alternative has been, but otherwise they wouldn’t survive.

The reliance on foreign students was never the preferred option for anyone but the government, and that was only so they could stop funding education. Now that alternative (really a last resort) is being limited by the government as well, so yeah, being pissed about it is reasonable.

Of course a much better option would be, for example, for the provincial government to provide higher government grants for every domestic student and to also provide that grant for more domestic students (most don’t realize this, but there is something called “corridor”, and universities don’t get government funding for domestic students above that government-induced number). These are provincial decisions, btw.

So yes, universities would love to take on more domestic students, and would love for the government to pay for them (and pay more for each), but that’s instead been decreasing for decades. So what’s this magic “new way” that universities are supposed to be trying instead?

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Exporting education IS taxing the rich. The rich just happen to be from a different country. The majority of those students are paying vast sums of money to these schools to get their education, then going back home after. That money was subsidizing education for Canadian citizens.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Yeah. There’s no way you’re going to get older, wealthier Canadian taxpayers to make up the shortfall by cutting back on international students.

We’re having a hard enough time as it is getting elementary school teachers paid. Universities cost FAR MORE per student than elementary schools. Tuition costs have skyrocketed way faster than inflation.

Making taxpayers pay all tuition costs is the surest way to get universities defunded completely.

[–] phx@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It used to be. Now it's bringing in people from India who have taken a loan or borrowed from family in order to get into a diploma mill, whilst actually working for an abusive boss in the "service industry"

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It would have been trivially easy to kill diploma mills off without affecting public universities and colleges. There's only around 200 of those across the whole country and they're heavily regulated/monitored/audited, and they could have just given them an exception on the quotas to keep them fully functional.

[–] phx@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

I'd mostly agree, although there are a number of institutions that were previously providing more balanced services and "saw green" to focus more on international revenue and might need to scale back as well.

Best thing is just to remove the changes that allowed international students to work off campus (and increase policing of those hiring illegally). That particular change really seems to have been a tipping point for the system

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 15 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Yea, this is stupid. One of my clients is a public college, and they're already hurting. They already cut a bunch of programs to save the rest. A new round of international student cuts is going to gut so many more that they just worked so hard to save.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Our politicians are incredibly short sighted. It's amazing that the same budget both defunds universities and says we want to attract the "best and the brightest" to those same universities.

[–] zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It’s annoying the only real choices are business daddy, or business daddy that’s deiniftely a bigoted racist.

[–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago

Yup, Neo-liberal or full blown Nuremberg. Easy choice but we're still getting fucked. We need ranked choice voting and proportional representation but how do you get our parliament to vote through a resolution that endangers a lot of their safe seats.

[–] Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

O boo hoo, Universities don't need unlimited growth. So what if they make less this year than they did last year. They are not hurting, only their unrestricted growth is threatened.

[–] honc@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Universities are non-profit organizations in Canada. I agree that they don’t need unlimited growth, but the consequence of not funding them is a decrease in the quality of education and the country’s ability to be at the forefront of research.

They are absolutely hurting right now, btw. One consequence of this is some (small) amount of improved efficiency, but the reality if this continues is a degradation of post-secondary education.

For example, more and more high school students will struggle to get into good programs, and then eventually, we just won’t have good programs.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

They’re hurting because they got addicted to international student funding and grew to ridiculous size, then that funding dried up and they don’t want to shrink back down to normal size.

It’s like a person being fed all-you-can-eat fried chicken and milkshakes, gaining 300 lbs, then being put on a healthy diet and complaining they’re hungry all the time.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago

The didn't get "addicted", they had their funding model fucked with by various levels of government. They don't choose their fucking revenue models! The state clawed back a bunch of funding and replaced it with international students, and now they're taking that away. So the result is massive hardship.

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

Most collegiate institutions in Canada have been going gangbusters for 20 years building new facilities and just generally being stupid with money, cutting down on tenured professors, loading up on administrators.

Like. Maybe some very poor decisions have been made for which there are consequences.

If they were underfunded and hurting for money then why would we do this? If they're underfunded and hurting for money now then why would we provide it when they were so irresponsible with it?

There could be nuance to this situation i don't understand but from my POV our higher educational institutions need to get their fucking shit together.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 hours ago

The one I have as a client has only built a new trades building and a new nursing building in the last 10 years, both for super in-demand programs. As far as I can tell they're not overly top heavy in any way.

Maybe certain institutions were being stupid, but it's definitely not all of them.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 hours ago

Because withholding the money doesn't punish the irresponsible parties, it punishes the students and (consequentially) all of society.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Somehow I doubt their budgets shortfall and spending choices are only because government wont give these private for profit institutions enough free money.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

What institutions are you talking about, specifically. Name a couple.

[–] olbaidiablo@lemmy.ca 8 points 11 hours ago

It's a good thing that university funding is provincial. Maybe they should stop cutting the funding and giving it to rich people, I'm looking at you Doug Ford.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 7 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

At the same time, the feds want to

recruit more than 1,000 top international researchers to Canada, with the budget injecting up to $1.7-billion into a suite of recruitment measures.

That'll be tough if universities see their income crater.

What do you think the $1.7B is supposed to cover?

They're trying to end low tier colleges just pumping through international students to inflate their financials, and instead trying to poach all the H1-B researchers in the US that are being scared away.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 5 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

It's the perfect crime! The feds create a problem with a solution that's under provincial jurisdiction...

[–] prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know about other provinces, but here in Ontario, the provincial government created the problem. Tuition has been frozen to 2019 levels and they reduced direct funding to universities and colleges. The "solution" was to massively ramp up international student enrollment, which came with a lot of other issues.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 3 points 10 hours ago

I think that's pretty universal, and it's been the case for decades.

[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 hours ago

A pleasant reversal from the usual situation. Like, all the regulations that sandbag against housing are municipal, which can only be overridden by the provinces.

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 minutes ago

I watched my local college lose all its credibility as a result of running borderline scams for foreign students. My old university otoh has been rather smart about not becoming too dependent on foriegn student tuition. I love immigration, and especially think exporting our education is a good thing, but the way these programs have been run in recent years is a cancer on these institutions and pure short term thinking. I'd rather see reform, but this is almost as good.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago

I know people who were qualified for graduate school, but did not get in. Mainly because foreign students pay better. There would actually be a more diverse/enjoyable university experience if more Canadians (say at least half of students) were admitted.

[–] Canuck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

There is too much bloat. I've seen first hand essentially glorified admins being paid $130k + full pension. They need to trim the fat at these places and restructure operations to get rid of all the waste.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 0 points 13 hours ago

Sweet talking conman right there.

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca -4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Entirely anecdotal, but a University I was attending almost went bankrupt during the pandemic because no one was paying for parking. Like, just losing that income almost destroyed it. I'm not sure Carney, who has never had to worry about rent, can really understand that.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 12 points 13 hours ago

Right. The guy has a PhD in economics, but doesn't understand how things get paid for. smh.